Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, August 27, 1991)
Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 91-192): Settlement approved and penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Consolidation Coal Company faced a civil penalty proceeding concerning the Humphrey No. 7 Mine. The Secretary vacated one citation for insufficient evidence and proposed reducing the remaining penalty from $212 to $135. Judge Gary Melick approved the settlement and ordered payment of the $135 penalty within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: One citation was vacated, the settlement was approved, and the remaining penalty was reduced to $135.
- Key point: The ALJ approved a reduced penalty after the Secretary withdrew one citation for insufficient evidence.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
2 Skyline, 10th Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 91-192
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-01453-03947
v.
Humphrey No. 7 Mine
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Robert Wilson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S.
Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for the Petitioner;
Walter J. Scheller III, Esq., Consolidation Coal Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. The Secretary vacated Citation No. 3307355 for insufficient evidence. A reduction in penalty from $212 to $135 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $135 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace