Southern Ohio Coal Company (ALJ decision, January 17, 1992)

Southern Ohio Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 91-1766-R): Settlement approved with citations affirmed, modified, and vacated

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEVA 91-1766-R, WEVA 91-1767-R, WEVA 91-1768-R, WEVA 91-1769-R, WEVA 91-1771-R
Decided
January 17, 1992
Presiding judge
Outcome
Mixed result
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Southern Ohio Coal Company and the Secretary of Labor presented a package settlement involving five docketed matters at the Martinka No. 1 Mine and several undocketed items. The settlement required testing of switch-gear and dead-block air gaps and an interim gap between one-half and one-and-one-half inches. The judge approved the settlement as consistent with the Act and the public interest. Under the order, one citation was affirmed, one order was modified to a section 104(a) significant-and-substantial citation and affirmed, and one citation plus two section 104(b) orders were vacated.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 811(c), 814(a), 814(b), and 814(d)(2).
  • Outcome: Citation No. 3105785 was affirmed, Order No. 3105797 was modified and affirmed, Citation No. 3105784 was vacated, and Order Nos. 3105788 and 3105798 were vacated.
  • Key point: The judge approved a settlement that resolved the docketed contests while requiring testing and an interim air-gap limit to address switch-gear safety.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOUTHERN OHIO COAL v. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19920117
TTEXT:


Page 2

~161
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
2 Skyline, 10 Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls church, Virginia 22041

SOUTHERN OHIO COAL COMPANY,
CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
CONTESTANT
v. Docket No. WEVA 91-1766-R
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Citation No. 3105784;
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
6/19/91
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
Docket No. WEVA 91-1767-R
Citation No. 3105785;
6/19/91

Docket No. WEVA 91-1768-R
Order No. 3105797; 7/8/91

Docket No. WEVA 91-1769-R
Order No. 3105798; 7/8/91

Docket No. WEVA 91-1771-R
Order No. 3105788; 7/1/91

Martinka No. 1 Mine

Mine ID 46-03805

DECISION

Appearances: Rebecca J. Zuleski, Esq., Furbee, Amos, Webb & Critchfield, Morgantown, West Virginia, for the Contestant;
Glenn M. Loos, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Maurer

At the hearing in Morgantown, West Virginia, on August 7, 1991, the parties jointly moved to settle these cases and three other as yet undocketed matters as a package deal.

The Secretary proposes to vacate Citation No. 3105784 because the evidence at trial would not support the fact of violation. More particularly, the Secretary concedes that the MSHA inspector who issued the citation failed to measure the gaps of the switch gear so that there is no accurate measurement of what the gaps were at the time the citation was issued.


Page 3

~162
The contestant, SOCCO, wishes to withdraw its contest of Citation No. 3105785 contained in Docket No. WEVA 91-1767-R and accept whatever penalty is assessed.

SOCCO also wishes to withdraw its contest in Docket No. WEVA 91-1768-R because the Secretary has agreed to delete the "unwarrantability" finding on that section 104(d)(2) Order, effectively transforming it into section 104(a) Citation No. 3105797 with "S&S" special findings. As modified, SOCCO has agreed to accept the citation and pay the civil penalty when it is assessed.

I have been holding the captioned cases up waiting for these assessments to be made by MSHA until now to no avail. Pursuant to a telephone conference call on January 16, 1992, the parties have agreed to handle any potential civil penalty problems related to these contest cases in the civil penalty docket when it is forthcoming, thereby facilitating the disposition of these contests at this time.

The Secretary further proposes to vacate the two section 104(b) Orders involved in this proceeding, Order Nos. 3105788 and 3105798 and as part and parcel of this settlement, Citation No. 3105791 and Order Nos. 3105799 and 3310101, which are as yet undocketed.

Another docket, Docket No. WEVA 91-1770-R, was originally heard at the same time, but has subsequently been severed and stayed, pending the outcome of a section 101(c) Petition for Modification presently under consideration before the Department of Labor.

The basic theme of the settlement package is that the parties have agreed to perform testing on the air gaps on the switch gear and dead blocks in the Martinka Mine to determine exactly what length gap is necessary to make the switch gears safe. Pending the outcome of that testing, SOCCO agrees to establish an interim air gap length between 1/2 and 1 1/2 inches. In the past, MSHA has provided the operator with differing requirements as to air gaps. With the full implementation of this settlement agreement, the technical problems of compliance should be resolved and the interests of mine safety advanced.

I therefore conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the Act and in furtherance of the public interest, and accordingly, will be approved, including the vacation of the undocketed items, although the actual orders with respect to the undocketed citation and orders will have to be deferred until such time as they are docketed and before me for disposition.


Page 4

~163
ORDER

Based on the above abbreviated findings of fact and conclusions of law, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Citation No. 3105785 IS AFFIRMED.

2. Order No. 3105797 IS MODIFIED to a section 104(a) S&S Citation and AFFIRMED as such.

3. Citation No. 3105784 IS VACATED.

4. Order Nos. 3105788 and 3105798 ARE VACATED.

Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace