Pigeon Branch Coal Company
Pigeon Branch Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 90-266): Settlement approved at $2,200
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Pigeon Branch Coal Company was the respondent in a civil penalty proceeding concerning its No. 8 Mine. The Secretary of Labor asked the judge to approve a settlement that reduced the proposed penalty from $4,400 to $2,200 and dismissed the case. Judge Avram Weisberger found the agreement appropriate under the statutory penalty criteria, approved the settlement, and ordered the company to pay $2,200 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and a $2,200 penalty was ordered.
- Key point: The judge approved the reduced penalty after finding the settlement appropriate under the statutory criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. PIGEON BRANCH COAL
DDATE:
19911021
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1709
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEVA 90-266
PETITIONER A.C. No. 46-05972-03531
v. No. 8 Mine
PIGEON BRANCH COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Weisberger
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of
civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to
approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A
reduction in penalty from $4,400 to $2,200 is proposed. I have
considered the representations and documentation submitted in
this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is
appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the
Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,
and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $2,200 within
30 days of this order.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1991, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.