James D. McMillen, Employed by Shillelagh Mining Company (ALJ decision, July 31, 1991)

James D. McMillen, Employed by Shillelagh Mining Company (FMSHRC WEVA 90-200): $3,000 settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 90-200
Decided
July 31, 1991
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-16

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1991
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

James D. McMillen, employed by Shillelagh Mining Company, was the respondent in a civil penalty proceeding involving the No. 5 Mine. The parties agreed to settle the matter for $3,000. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement under the provisions of the Mine Act. The operator was ordered to pay $3,000 within 30 days if it had not already done so. The decision does not state a specific mine safety standard.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: None stated in the decision.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, and the operator was ordered to pay $3,000 within 30 days.
  • Key point: The judge approved the parties' $3,000 settlement under the Mine Act.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

July 31, 1991

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEVA 90-200
Petitioner : A. C. No. 46-03875-03546 A
v. : No. 5 Mine
:
JAMES D. McMILLEN, EMPLOYED :
BY SHILLELAGH MINING
:
COMPANY,
:
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO PAY
Before: Judge Merlin
The parties now advise that they have agreed to settle this matter for $3,000. Upon review of the matter I determine that the settlement is entitled to approval under the provisions of the Act.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the settlement be APPROVED.
It is further ORDERED that the operator, if it has not already done so, pay $3,000 within 30 days from the date of this decision and order.

[illegible]
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
J. Philip Smith, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail) J. Randolph Query, Esq., 5130 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, WV 25304 (Certified Mail) Mr. James D. McMillen, P. O. Box 2852, Chapmanville, WV 25501 (Certified Mail)

1198

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace