Bill Pack Land Corporation and PCR Joint Venture (ALJ decision, May 16, 1990)

Bill Pack Land Corporation and PCR Joint Venture (FMSHRC WEVA 88-318, WEVA 88-355): Fire-control settlements approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEVA 88-355, WEVA 88-318
Decided
May 16, 1990
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-16

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1990
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision approved settlements addressing a long-burning coal-refuse-pile fire, affirmed the listed citation and order in each docket, and set a $350 penalty for each respondent. It became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

These consolidated civil penalty proceedings involved a coal-mine refuse pile in West Virginia that had been burning for more than 50 years. After a hearing and settlement conference, Bill Pack Land Corporation and PCR Joint Venture agreed to reduced penalties, fire-control and extinguishing plans, and conditions for resuming operations. Judge William Fauver approved both settlements. He affirmed the listed citation and order in each docket, set a $350 penalty for each respondent, and authorized modification of the withdrawal orders if the respondents complied fully with their plans.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The decision does not identify a specific Mine Act or regulatory standard.
  • Outcome: Both settlements were approved, the listed citation and order in each docket were affirmed, and each respondent was ordered to pay $350.
  • Key point: Resumption of operations was conditioned on full compliance with the agreed fire-control and extinguishing plans.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

1035
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 88-318
PETITIONER
A. C. No. 46-07006-03503

v. Whipple Refuse File

BILL PACK LAND CORPORATION,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
RESPONDENT
Docket No. WEVA 88-355
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
A. C. No. 46-06415-03502
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
PCR Surface
PETITIONER
v.

PCR JOINT VENTURE,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Ronald Gurka, Office of the Solicitor, Arlington, Virginia, for the Secretary;

Philip D. Mooney, Esq., Hamilton, Mooney, Burgess, Young and Tissue, Oak Hill, West Virginia, for Bill Pack Land Corporation,

P. Nathan Bowles, Esq., Bowles, McDavid, Graff and Love, Charleston West Virginia, for PCR Joint Venture.

Before: Judge Fauver

In these consolidated cases the Secretary seeks civil penalties for alleged violations of safety standards under the Federal Mine Safety Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.

The cases involve a coal mine refuse pile that has been on fire for over 50 years.

The cases were called for hearing on February 13, 1990, at Charleston, West Virginia. After testimony, and the introduction and documentary evidence, the parties, with the presiding judge, had an extensive settlement conference. This

led to a settlement agreement that includes a reduced penalty for each Respondent, an agreed upon plan for extinguishing the fire, and an agreement to modify withdrawal orders to permit Respondents to resume operations in accordance with the fire control and extinguishing plan.

I have considered the hearing evidence, and the documents submitted with the Secretary's motions to approve settlement, and conclude that they are consistent with the purposes of the Act.

ORDER

WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Secretary's motion to approve settlement in Docket No. WEVA 88-318 is GRANTED.

2. The Secretary's motion to approve settlement in Docket No.
WEVA 88-355 is GRANTED.

3. Respondent Bill Pack Land Corporation shall comply fully with all the terms of the fire control and extinguishing plan attached to the Secretary's motion for settlement in Docket No. WEVA 88-318.

4. Respondent PCR Joint Venture shall comply fully with all the terms of the fire control and extinguishing plan attached to the Secretary's motion to approve settlement in Docket No. WEVA 88-355.

5. Subject to each Respondent's continued full compliance with such fire control and extinguishing plans, the Secretary may modify Withdrawal Order Nos. 2574254 and 2574256 to permit the Respondents, respectively, to resume operations in compliance with such plans.

6. Citation No. 2715802 and Order No. 2754254 are AFFIRMED.

7. Respondent Bill Pack Land Corporation shall pay the approved penalty of $350 within 30 days of this Decision.

8. Citation No. 2715803 and Order No. 2574256 are AFFIRMED.

9. Respondent PCR Joint Venture shall pay the approved penalty of $350 within 30 days of this Decision.

William Fauver
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace