Cannelton Industries, Inc. (ALJ decision, December 29, 1988)

Cannelton Industries, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 88-281-D): Discrimination settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 88-281-D
Decided
December 29, 1988
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-17
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1988 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1988
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Raymond Long brought a Mine Act discrimination proceeding against Cannelton Industries after a workplace incident and a written warning. The settlement required the company to send Long a letter, post it at the mine for 30 days, expunge the warning, avoid using the incident in future disciplinary or personnel decisions, and provide foreman training on section 105(c) of the Mine Act. The company also agreed to pay a $1,000 civil penalty and post the motion and order. Judge James A. Broderick approved the settlement and dismissed the proceeding subject to the company carrying out its terms.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, the $1,000 civil penalty was ordered, and the proceeding was dismissed subject to compliance.
  • Key point: The judge approved a discrimination-case settlement requiring corrective measures, training, posting, and payment of a civil penalty.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) & R. LONG V. CANNELTON INDUSTRIES DDATE: 19881229 TTEXT:


Page 2

~1778
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 88-281-D
ON BEHALF OF RAYMOND LONG,
HOPE 88-12
COMPLAINANT
v. No. 130 Mine

CANNELTON INDUSTRIES, INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING

Before: Judge Broderick

On December 15 and 19, 1988, the Secretary filed a motion to approve a settlement agreed to by all parties to this proceeding. Respondent agrees to send the letter attached to the motion as Exhibit 1, to complainant Long, and to post a copy of the letter at the mine for 30 days. Respondent agrees to expunge the written warning issued to Long from his personnel file. It further agrees not to consider the incident of February 12, 1988, in any disciplinary action or personnel decision involving complainant. Respondent agrees to set up a training program for its foremen regarding the provisions of section 105(c) of the Mine Act. The program shall conform to the outline attached to the motion as Exhibit 2 and may be monitored by MSHA. It further agrees to pay a civil penalty of $1000, and to post a copy of the motion and this order at the mine for 30 days.

This case does not involve any lost time or claim for back pay or expenses. I have considered the motion in the light of the purposes of section 105(c) of the Act, and conclude that it should be approved.

Accordingly, the motion to approve settlement is GRANTED;
Respondent is ordered to carry out the terms of the settlement, and to pay the civil penalty of $1000 within 30 days of the date of this decision. Subject to Respondent carrying out the terms of the settlement, this proceeding is DISMISSED.

James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace