Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, November 16, 1987)

Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 87-42(B)): Settlement approved and citation vacated

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 87-42(B)
Decided
November 16, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Mixed result
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Consolidation Coal had two remaining citations in the WEVA 87-42(B) docket. The judge vacated citation 2713101 after medical information showed that an employee suffered grease burns rather than an electrical shock or other life-threatening injury, so the company was not required to report the event under the cited standard. The judge approved a settlement of citation 2703915, which alleged that a trolley wire was not adequately guarded, reducing the penalty from $1,000 to $800. The proceeding was dismissed subject to payment of the settlement amount.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 50.10; 30 C.F.R. § 75.1003
  • Outcome: Citation 2713101 was vacated, and citation 2703915 was settled for $800.
  • Key point: The settlement reduced the penalty for the trolley-wire citation, while the reporting citation was vacated after the injury was found not to be life-threatening.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. CONSOLIDATION COAL
DDATE:
19871116
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1950

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
Docket No. WEVA 87-42(B)
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
A.C. No. 46-01453-03735

v. Humphrey No. 7 Mine

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING

Before: Judge Broderick

Two citations remain in this docket, 2703915 and 2713101.
Citation 2713124, transferred to this docket from WEVA 87-42(A) by order of May 19, 1987, was actually a part of the settlement approved by order of May 20, 1987, in Docket WEVA 87-42(A). See letter from Michael Peelish, Esq., dated October 30, 1987, together with copies of the payments made for the approved settlement. Docket WEVA 87-42(A) is closed.

The Secretary moved to withdraw this civil penalty petition with respect to citation 2713101 and to vacate the citation. The citation alleged a violation of 30 C.F.R. 50.10 because Consol did not immediately contact MSHA upon the occurrence of an "accident." The term accident is defined as an injury which has a reasonable potential to cause death. It was originally assumed that the injury involved here was a serious electrical shock. Further investigation, including hospital and medical reports and a written statement from the injured employee, disclosed that grease burns to his hands were the only injuries he sustained and that he did not suffer electrical shock. Therefore, the motion contends that the injury involved was not life threatening. Based on the representations in the motion, it is GRANTED. The penalty proceeding is DISMISSED as it relates to citation 2713101 and the citation is VACATED.

Citation 2703915 alleges a violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.1003 because a trolley wire was not adequately guarded. The violation was originally assessed at $1000, and the parties propose to settle for $800. The motion states that the employee who was injured, a certified electrician, was directed to guard the wire before performing the work on the track, but he failed to do so. This mitigates Consol's negligence. I have considered the motion in the light of the criteria in section 110(i) of the Act, and conclude that it should be approved.

Accordingly, the settlement agreement is APPROVED, and subject to the payment by Consol of the $800, this proceeding is DISMISSED.

James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace