Birchfield Mining Incorporated (ALJ decision, February 2, 1989)

Birchfield Mining Incorporated (FMSHRC WEVA 87-272): Pre-shift examination penalty reduced to $300

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 87-272
Decided
February 2, 1989
Presiding judge
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-08-17

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1989
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Birchfield Mining Incorporated was cited for failing to complete and record a required pre-shift examination at No. 1 Mine. Judge Gary Melick had previously assessed a $400 civil penalty for the serious violation. On remand, the Commission's finding that the violation was not significant and substantial required a corresponding reduction in the penalty. The judge ordered Birchfield to pay $300 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.303(a)
  • Outcome: The violation remained established, but the civil penalty was reduced from $400 to $300.
  • Key point: A finding that a violation was not significant and substantial reduced the penalty when gravity had been a significant part of the original assessment.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BIRCHFIELD MINING
DDATE:
19890202
TTEXT:


Page 2

~198
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 87-272
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-07273-03501

v. No. 1 Mine

BIRCHFIELD MINING INCORPORATED
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Mary K. Spencer, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia for Petitioner;
William D. Stover, Esq., Beckley, West
Virginia for Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

This case is before me upon remand by a majority of the Commission to determine whether its findings that the violation at issue was not "significant and substantial" would affect the amount of civil penalty imposed below.

In the decision below, 9 FMSHRC 2209 (1987), it was found that the failure to complete and record a pre-shift examination required by 30 C.F.R. 75.303(a) was a "serious" violation and warranted a civil penalty of $400. The Commission majority found however that the violation did not contribute "a measure of danger to safety" and in essence did not constitute a serious hazard. Since the gravity determination below was a significant component in the amount of penalty established, there must now be a corresponding reduction in penalty. Accordingly considering the criteria under section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq., I now direct that a penalty of $300 be paid.


Page 3

~199
ORDER

Birchfield Mining Incorporated is hereby directed to pay a civil penalty of $300 within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
(703) 756-6261

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace