Peabody Coal Company (ALJ decision, May 20, 1987)

Peabody Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 86-376-D): Discrimination settlement approved and case dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 86-376-D
Decided
May 20, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary reported that David Ward had received or would receive all relief sought in his discrimination case against Peabody Coal. The assessed $1,000 penalty had also been paid. Judge Roy J. Maurer found the settlement consistent with the purposes and spirit of the statute, approved it, and dismissed the matter.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: None stated in this order.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and the discrimination matter was dismissed.
  • Key point: Completion of the agreed relief and payment of the assessed penalty supported dismissal of the discrimination proceeding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. PEABODY COAL
DDATE:
19870520
TTEXT:


Page 2

~951

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 86-376-D
ON BEHALF OF
DAVID WARD,
HOPE CD 86-6
COMPLAINANT
Montcoal No. 7 Mine v.

PEABODY COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Maurer

The Secretary has filed a motion explaining that pursuant to agreement between the parties, the complainant now has received or will receive all the relief sought in this case. Furthermore, the assessed penalty of $1,000 has been paid.

Based upon my review of the Secretary's motion, I am satisfied that the proposed settlement is consistent with the purposes and spirit of the statute.

In light of the foregoing, the proposed settlement is APPROVED and this matter is hereby DISMISSED.

Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace