Secretary of Labor on behalf of William C. Beveridge v. Globe Enterprises (ALJ decision, May 31, 1985)

Secretary of Labor on behalf of William C. Beveridge v. Globe Enterprises (FMSHRC WEVA 85-68-D): Discrimination case settled for $500

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 85-68-D
Decided
May 31, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index for this docket. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor brought a discrimination proceeding on behalf of William Beveridge against Globe Enterprises, involving its Blacksville No. 1 Mine. After a hearing, the parties proposed a settlement paying Beveridge $500 in two $250 installments and withdrawing the proposed penalty. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy found the agreement consistent with the Mine Act and approved it. He confirmed the settlement as the final order and dismissed the case subject to payment. The decision does not describe the alleged discriminatory conduct or make a violation finding.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: No specific Mine Act provision or safety standard is identified in this order.
  • Outcome: $500 settlement approved for Beveridge in two installments; proposed penalty withdrawn and dismissal subject to payment.
  • Key point: The judge approved the parties' agreement after the hearing without deciding the underlying discrimination claim.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. GLOBE ENTERPRISES
DDATE:
19850531
TTEXT:
~856
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 85-68-D
ON BEHALF OF
WILLIAM C. BEVERIDGE,
MSHC Case No. MORG CD 84-3
COMPLAINANT
Blacksville No. 1 Mine v.

GLOBE ENTERPRISES,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Howard K. Agran, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, for Complainant;
Ralph K. Johnson, Office Manager and Chief Accountant for Globe Enterprises, for
Respondent.

Before: Judge Kennedy

This matter was heard in Morgantown, West Virginia on Tuesday, May 21, 1985. At the close of the case, the parties conferred for the purpose of settlement and thereafter moved for approval of a settlement of this matter. The settlement proposed was to pay complainant the amount of $500 in two installments of $250 each within 30 and 60 days respectively and to withdraw the proposal for penalty.

Based on the evidence adduced, I found the settlement proposed was in accord with the purposes and policy of the Act. Accordingly, it was ORDERED that the motion be APPROVED and that the operator pay the amount of the settlement agreed upon on or before Saturday, July 20, 1985.
~857
The premises considered, it is ORDERED that the disposition approved be, and hereby is, CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as the final order in this matter and that subject to payment of the amount agreed upon the captioned matter be and hereby is, DISMISSED.

Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace