Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Beckley Coal Mining Company (ALJ decision, November 12, 1985)

Secretary of Labor v. Beckley Coal Mining Company (FMSHRC WEVA 85-28): Penalty case dismissed after payment

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 85-28
Decided
November 12, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Beckley Coal Mining Company told the Commission, in response to an order to show cause, that it had paid the penalty in full and did not want a hearing. Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin dismissed the civil penalty case. He also rejected the company's assertion that the payment could not be considered in an administrative forum. The order says the payment forms part of the operator's prior violation history. It does not state the penalty amount or decide a contested citation on the merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: None in this order.
  • Outcome: The civil penalty proceeding was dismissed after the operator paid the penalty in full; the amount is not stated.
  • Key point: The judge said payment of the penalty remains part of the operator's prior history.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. BECKLEY COAL MINING
DDATE:
19851112
TTEXT:
~1818
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 85-28
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-03092-03569

v. Beckley Coal Mining Company

BECKLEY COAL MINING COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before: Judge Merlin

In response to an Order to Show Cause issued by this Commission, the operator advises it paid the penalty in full. Accordingly, it does not want a hearing. The matter appears ripe for dismissal. However, operator's counsel is in error in asserting that its payment herein cannot be considered in any administrative forum. This payment constitutes part of its prior history, Old Ben Coal Company, 4 IBMA 198 (June 1975), Peggs Run Coal Co., Inc., 6 IBMA 212 (June 1976).

In light of the foregoing, this case is DISMISSED.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace