Secretary of Labor v. Monument Mining Corporation (ALJ decision, January 25, 1985)
Secretary of Labor v. Monument Mining Corporation (FMSHRC WEVA 85-25): $500 citation affirmed after company defaulted
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought a $500 penalty against Monument Mining Corporation for a violation of a surface mine equipment safety standard. After the company's lawyers withdrew, Judge Richard C. Steffey asked Monument to identify a new representative and provide an address for case notices. The company did not respond, and the post office returned the judge's certified order after Monument declined to accept it. The judge found Monument in default for failing to comply with Commission rules or accept mailed orders. He assessed the proposed $500 penalty for the cited violation without deciding its merits in a contested hearing.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 77.404(a), equipment condition and maintenance.
- Outcome: Citation affirmed by default; $500 penalty assessed.
- Key point: A respondent that failed to provide a representative or accept case notices was found in default and ordered to pay the proposed penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MONUMENT MINING
DDATE:
19850125
TTEXT:
~160
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 85-25
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-04465-03534
v. No. 1 Surface Mine
MONUMENT MINING CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
DEFAULT DECISION
Before: Judge Steffey
An order was issued on December 18, 1984, in the above-entitled proceeding permitting the law firm which had filed an answer to the Secretary of Labor's petition for assessment of civil penalty to withdraw as counsel for respondent on the ground that the law firm was no longer authorized to represent respondent in this proceeding.
The grant of counsel's request to withdraw left the case before me with no known representative and with no official address or telephone number at which respondent could be reached for the purpose of serving notices of hearing or orders. The Commission's rules, 29 C.F.R. 2700.5(c), require that each document filed with the Commission provide the filing person's name, address, and telephone number and require that the Commission be promptly notified of any change in address or business telephone number. Therefore, the order allowing respondent's counsel to withdraw also contained a request that respondent provide the name, address, and telephone number of the person who had been designated by respondent to represent it in this proceeding in view of the fact that respondent's counsel had been allowed to withdraw as respondent's representative. Paragraph (C) of the order stated that:
(C) This order is being sent to the business address given for respondent in MSHA's petition for assessment of civil penalty. If no reply to this order is received, or if the letter is returned by the post office as undeliverable, respondent will be found to be in default and a final order will be issued requiring respondent to pay the penalty of $500 proposed by MSHA despite the fact that the default decision may be undeliverable.
~161
The envelope containing the above-described order was returned by the post office as undeliverable because respondent had declined to accept the envelope after the post office had given respondent two notices of the fact that the envelope containing the order had been received by the post office.
Respondent's refusal to provide the name of a person to represent respondent in this proceeding prevents me from being able to process the case because there is no known address at which respondent will accept notices of hearing or orders. Therefore, I find respondent to be in default for failure to comply with the Commission's rules or accept envelopes sent by certified mail. Section 2700.63(b) of the Commission's rules provides that when a judge finds the respondent in default in a civil penalty proceeding, he "shall also enter a summary order assessing the proposed penalties as final, and directing that such penalties be paid."
WHEREFORE, it is ordered:
Monument Mining Corporation, having been found to be in default, shall, within 30 days from the date of this decision, pay a civil penalty of $500 for the violation of 30 C.F.R. 77.404(a) alleged in Citation No. 2142832 dated May 16, 1984.
Richard C. Steffey
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace