Southern Ohio Coal Company

Plain-English summary

Southern Ohio Coal Company faced a civil penalty proceeding and a contest concerning an alleged failure to conduct a required examination at the Martinka No. 1 Mine. A miner suffered minor injuries after contacting a roof bolt and being struck by loose shale. The parties settled for the full proposed $500 penalty, agreed to modify the section 104(d)(2) order to a section 104(a) citation, and left the significant-and-substantial finding in place. Judge George A. Koutras approved the settlement and ordered payment within 30 days, after which the penalty case and contest were to be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 75.303, with enforcement under 30 U.S.C. §§ 814(a), 814(d)(2), and 820(a)
• Outcome: The $500 penalty was approved, the section 104(d)(2) order was modified to a section 104(a) citation, and the contest was dismissed after settlement.
• Key point: The judge approved the settlement after finding it reasonable and in the public interest.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOUTHERN OHIO COAL v. SOL (MSHA)
SOL (MSHA) v. SOUTHERN OHIO COAL
DDATE:
19850903
TTEXT:

Page 2

~1380
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges

SOUTHERN OHIO COAL COMPANY, CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
v. Docket No. WEVA 85-97-R
Order No. 2412633; 1/17/85
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Martinka No. 1 Mine
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEVA 85-218
PETITIONER A.C. No. 46-03805-03652
v.
Martinka No. 1
SOUTHERN OHIO COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

                            DECISION

Appearances: David A. Laing and Gregory W. Swart, Esqs.,
Alexander, Ebinger, Fisher, McAlister & Lawrence,
Columbus, Ohio, for Contestant/Respondent;
Howard K. Agran, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, for Respondent/Petitioner.

Before: Judge Koutras

                     Statement of the Case

 These consolidated proceedings concern a civil penalty

proposal filed by MSHA against the Southern Ohio Coal Company
pursuant to section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health
Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 820(a), seeking a civil penalty
assessment in the amount of $500 for an alleged violation of
mandatory safety standard 30 C.F.R. 75.303, as stated in a
section 104(d)(2) Order No. 2412633, with special "S & S"
findings, issued by an MSHA inspector on January 17, 1985. Docket
No. WEVA 85-218 is the civil penalty case, and Docket No. WEVA
85-97-R is the contest filed by Southern Ohio Coal Company
challenging the legality of the order and the special "S & S"
findings.

Page 3

~1381
The parties engaged in prehearing discovery, and subpoenas were
issued compelling the attendance of witnesses at the hearing.
However, at the hearing, counsel for the parties advised me that
they proposed to resolve the dispute by settlement of the issues
involved in the proceedings. Accordingly, the parties were
afforded an opportunity to present their arguments in support of
the proposed settlement disposition, and I issued a bench
decision approving the settlement.

                          Discussion

 The order in question was issued after MSHA Inspector Homer

W. Delovich determined that a preshift or onshift inspection was
not made at one of the underground working places in the mine.
MSHA's counsel explained that a miner wearing a protective helmet
suffered minor injuries when he came in contact with a roof bolt
and some loose shale fell on him. Counsel contended that had the
required examinations been performed, the general roof conditions
would have been discovered and corrected prior to anyone working
the cited area (Tr. 8, 9). Counsel also indicated that Inspector
Delovich confirmed that the required examination had not been
conducted, and he did so through interviews with several miners
at the mine (Tr. 11).

 The operator's counsel pointed out that the miner in

question was not seriously injured, and although he left the mine
on the day of the incident, he returned to work the next day (Tr.
9). Counsel also asserted that had this case gone to hearing, he
would argue that the foreman who made the work assignments on the
day in question did not know, nor should have known, that the
miner who was injured was in the area in question. Counsel
asserted further that the cited area was part of an escapeway
which had received its weekly inspection the day prior to the
accident (Tr. 11, 12).

 Under the terms of the settlement, Southern Ohio Coal

Company agreed to pay the full proposed civil penalty assessment
of $500. MSHA's counsel asserted that the parties also agreed
that the violation would be modified from a section 104(d)(2)
order to a section 104(a) citation, and that the inspector's "S &
S" finding would stand. Counsel confirmed that based on further
information, he has determined that the violation was not an
unwarrantable failure and that he had consulted with Inspector
Delovich in this regard (Tr. 4, 5). A copy of Inspector
Delovich's modification of his order was filed with me after the
hearing, and it is a matter of record.

Page 4

~1382
The parties stipulated that Southern Ohio Coal Company is a large
mine operator and that the payment of the assessed civil penalty
will not adversely affect its ability to continue in business
(Tr. 7). They also agreed that the violation was promptly abated
in good faith (Tr. 8). MSHA's counsel indicated that the degree
of negligence was moderate, and as previously indicated, the
injury suffered by the miner was not serious. With regard to the
prior history of violations, the operator's counsel stated that
based on information provided by the company safety director, he
was unaware of any prior violations of section 75.303 for failure
to conduct required examinations (Tr. 9).

                          Conclusion

 After careful consideration of all of the arguments

presented by the parties in support of their proposed settlement
disposition of the civil penalty case, I conclude and find that
the proposed settlement disposition is reasonable and in the
public interest. Accordingly, IT IS APPROVED.

                            ORDER

 The Southern Ohio Coal Company IS ORDERED to pay a civil

penalty in the amount of $500 for the violation in question, and
payment is to be made to MSHA within thirty (30) days of the date
of this decision. Upon receipt of payment, the civil penalty case
is dismissed. The operator's motion to withdraw its contest is
granted, and it is dismissed.

                           George A. Koutras
                           Administrative Law Judge