Local Union 5817, UMWA v. Monument Mining Corporation (Commission decision, June 16, 1988)
Local Union 5817, UMWA v. Monument Mining Corporation (FMSHRC WEVA 85-21-C): Compensation case remanded
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1988, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Local Union No. 5817, District 17, UMWA brought a compensation matter involving Monument Mining Corporation and Island Creek Coal Company. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the Commission's earlier decision and remanded the matter for further proceedings. The Commission sent the case back to the originally assigned administrative law judge, including for any remaining challenges to the compensation complaint that had not been waived.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in this order.
- Outcome: The matter was remanded to the administrative law judge for further proceedings.
- Key point: The Commission followed the court of appeals' mandate and returned the case for consideration of any unresolved compensation-complaint issues.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
UMWA V. MONUMENT MINING & ISLAND CREEK COAL DDATE: 19880616 TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
June 16, 1988
LOCAL UNION NO. 5817, DISTRICT 17,
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA
(UMWA)
v.
Docket No. WEVA 85-21-C
MONUMENT MINING CORPORATION and
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY
BEFORE: Ford, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, Lastowka and Nelson, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
On February 23, 1988, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in this matter, styled International Union, UMWA v. FMSHRC, 840 F.2d 77 (D.C. Cir. 1988), reversing the Commission's decision (Local Union No. 5817, District 17, UMWA v. Monument Mining Corp. and Island Creek Coal Co., 9 FMSHRC 209 (February 1987)), and remanding for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
In accordance with the Court's order, we are obliged to remand this matter to the administrative law judge originally assigned for further proceedings including, if necessary, consideration of any remaining challenges by Island Creek Coal Company to the complaint for compensation that have not been previously waived.
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
James A. Lastowka, Commissioner
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace