Secretary of Labor v. Ruttman Corporation (ALJ decision, May 30, 1985)
Secretary of Labor v. Ruttman Corporation (FMSHRC WEVA 84-300): $84 silo hazard settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA cited Ruttman Corporation for tripping hazards and unguarded floor openings on top of a silo at its Pine Creek No. 12 preparation plant. The openings presented an approximately 30-foot fall hazard. Each citation carried a $42 assessment, and the parties proposed settlement at those original amounts. Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin accepted the proposal and ordered the operator to pay $84 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 77.208(a) and 77.200, concerning the silo hazards described in the order.
- Outcome: Both citations settled for their original $42 assessments, totaling $84.
- Key point: The judge approved full payment for the tripping hazards and unguarded silo openings.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. RUTTMAN CORPORATION
DDATE:
19850530
TTEXT:
~678
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 84-300
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-06197-03501 A41
v. Pine Creek No. 12 Prep.
Plant
RUTTMAN CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
The Solicitor has filed a Motion for Decision and Order Approving Settlement in the above-referenced case. At issue are two violations, originally assessed at $42 each. Settlement is proposed in the original penalty amounts.
Citation No. 2274227 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R.
77.208A, in that there were stumbling hazards present on the top of the silo. The Solicitor represents that negligence and gravity were moderate. Steel ropes, wooden cap blocks, power cables and metal created both falling and tripping hazards in the area. The Solicitor maintains that full payment of the $42 penalty is appropriate.
Citation No. 2274228 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R.
77.200, when two openings in the top of the silo floor measuring 6 x 9 were found. The Solicitor asserts that this opening left unguarded posed a free fall hazard of approximately thirty feet. The Solicitor represents that negligence and gravity were moderate and that accordingly, full payment of the $42 penalty is proper.
The Solicitor further represents that the operator is small with an excellent history of prior violations.
I accept the Solicitor's representations and find the proposed settlements in accord with the policies and purposes of the Act. The settlements are therefore APPROVED.
~779
ORDER
The operator is hereby ORDERED to pay $84 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace