Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Westmoreland Coal Company (ALJ decision, December 21, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Westmoreland Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 83-237): Respirable dust penalty settled for $225
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA proposed a $311 penalty against Westmoreland Coal Company for a respirable dust violation measured at 2.5 milligrams per cubic meter at the Hampton No. 3 Mine. The parties agreed to a $225 penalty, a 27 percent reduction. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy independently reviewed the settlement and found it consistent with the Mine Act's purposes. He ordered payment of $225 and dismissal of the case subject to payment. The decision does not identify the regulation number for the dust violation.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: Respirable dust requirement; no regulation number stated in the decision.
- Outcome: Proposed $311 penalty settled for $225; case dismissed subject to payment.
- Key point: The judge approved a 27 percent reduction after independently reviewing the settlement.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. WESTMORELAND COAL
DDATE:
19831221
TTEXT:
~2216
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 83-237
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-01283-03518
v. Hampton No. 3 Mine
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Kennedy
The parties move for approval of a settlement of the respirable dust violation (2.5 mg/m3) charged in the captioned proposal at a 27% reduction in the amount initially assessed ($225 v. $311).
Based on an independent evaluation and de novo review of the circumstances, I find the settlement proposed is in accord with the purposes and policy of the Act.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the operator pay the amount of the penalty agreed upon, $225, on or before Friday, January 4, 1984, and that subject to payment the captioned matter be DISMISSED.
Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace