Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Thompson Coal & Construction, Inc. (ALJ decision, November 15, 1983)

Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Thompson Coal & Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 83-138): Legal identity citation vacated

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 83-138
Decided
November 15, 1983
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations vacated
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-21

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1983
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA cited Thompson Coal & Construction for failing to update a mine legal identity report after responsibility for the Jerry Run Mine shifted to a new superintendent. Judge Gary Melick found that the operator had 30 days after a change to file updated information. The record did not establish when the new superintendent took over, so the judge could not determine whether that period had expired when MSHA issued the citation. He vacated the citation and dismissed the case.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: 30 C.F.R. §§ 41.20 and 41.12.
  • Outcome: Citation No. 2020854 vacated; case dismissed.
  • Key point: MSHA did not establish the change date needed to prove the operator missed the filing deadline.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. THOMPSON COAL
DDATE:
19831115
TTEXT:
~1961

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 83-138
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-02557-03504

v. Jerry Run Surface Mine

THOMPSON COAL & CONSTRUCTION,
INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Thomas A. Brown, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, for Petitioner Charles G. Johnson, Esq., Johnson & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Respondent

Before: Judge Melick

Hearings were held in this case on September 22, 1983, in Clarksburg, West Virginia. A bench decision was thereafter rendered and appears below with only non-substantive changes.

The case before me today is based upon the Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
One violation of the standard at 30 CFR Section 41.20 is alleged and charges the Thompson Coal & Construction Company, Inc. (Thompson), with failing to file an updated "Form 2000-7" with the MSHA District Manager listing the operating officials and principal officer in charge of safety at the Jerry Run Mine. The standard at 30 CFR Section 41.20 requires that "ÕeÊach operator of a coal or other mine shall file notification of legal identity and every change thereof with the appropriate District Manager of the Mine Safety and Health Administration by properly completing, mailing, or otherwise delivering Form 2000-7 "legal identity report' which shall be provided by the Mine Safety and Health Administration for this purpose."
~1962
The general issue before me, of course, is whether there was indeed a violation as alleged, and, if so, what is the appropriate civil penalty to be assessed. The specific issue before me is whether on December 8th, 1982, the date this citation was issued and the violation cited, the mine operator had failed to file a modification of his legal identity report as required. The evidence in this case shows that as of March 15, 1982, the operator had filed a proper legal identity report (Form 2000-7), and there is no dispute over that (Exhibit G-2). At that time, Richard L. Bryant was identified as mine superintendent and in charge of health and safety. The evidence shows that when MSHA Inspector Alonzo Curry appeared on December 8, 1982, for a spot inspection at Thompson's Jerry Run Mine, Bryant was not present and that Larry Reall represented to the inspector that he was then in charge of health and safety and was mine superintendent. It is not at all clear, however, how long Mr. Reall had been in charge, either as superintendent or in charge of health and safety matters, and it appears that there was a transitional period around this time; that is, transition from Mr. Bryant's being superintendent and in charge of health and safety and turning those responsibilities over to Mr. Reall.

Now, Section 41.20 of the regulations does not set forth any time limit within which the operator must file his notification of changes in his legal identity.
However, 30 CFR 41.12 gives the operator thirty days after the occurrence of any change to file the information required and the Secretary has acknowledged in this case that the operator would indeed have thirty days from the date of any change to file any corresponding modification to his legal identity report.

Under the circumstances of this case it is not known precisely when the change in job responsibilities actually occurred. There is absolutely no evidence on that point so as of December 8th, when the citation was drawn, it is not known whether Mr. Reall had been acting as superintendent and in charge of health and safety for one day, five days, twenty days, thirty days, forty days, or whatever. Under the circumstances, it is impossible to determine whether the operator failed to
~1963 file within 30 days of the change in management. Accordingly, I cannot find a violation of the cited standard, and I am going to vacate the citation.

I think in spite of this ruling that Mr. Thompson does recognize the significance of filing these reports even though, in this case, it appears that there is no question that there was someone in charge, whether it was Bryant or Mr. Reall. If MSHA is unable to maintain a current roster of who is responsible for the operation of a mine and who is going to be in charge of health and safety, some less responsible operators would certainly use that to their advantage in not complying with health and safety matters and perhaps would not even have someone in charge of health and safety. So, although there is not that situation in this case, I think the operator would have to recognize that there is a valid reason for this regulation to be on the books, and it is essential that it be complied with.

ORDER

Citation No. 2020854 is hereby vacated and this case is dismissed.

Gary Melick
Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace