Secretary of Labor v. Island Creek Coal Company (ALJ decision, August 18, 1982)

Secretary of Labor v. Island Creek Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 80-72): $200 penalty settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 80-72
Decided
August 18, 1982
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1982 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor and Island Creek Coal Company proposed a settlement in a civil penalty case concerning the Birch No. 2-A Mine. The proposed penalty was $610, and the parties sought to reduce it to $200. Judge Gary Melick considered the submitted representations and documents under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. He approved the settlement and ordered Island Creek to pay $200 within 30 days. The order does not identify the underlying safety standard or describe the violation.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): No standard is identified in this settlement order.
  • Outcome: Settlement approved; proposed penalty reduced from $610 to $200.
  • Key point: The judge found the agreed reduction appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. ISLAND COAL
DDATE:
19820818
TTEXT:

~1565

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 80-72
PETITIONER A.C. No. 46-01459-03053 v.
Birch No. 2-A Mine
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $610 to $ 200is proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proferred settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $200 within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace