Secretary of Labor (MSHA) on behalf of Gerald D. Boone v. Rebel Coal Company (ALJ decision, January 13, 1984)

Secretary of Labor (MSHA) on behalf of Gerald D. Boone v. Rebel Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 80-532-D): Discrimination complaint withdrawn after payment

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 80-532-D
Decided
January 13, 1984
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-21
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1984 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1984
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision under the Mine Act's 40-day rule
This administrative law judge decision became a final decision of the Commission because no Commissioner directed review within 40 days, under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is binding on the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary asked to withdraw Gerald Boone's discrimination complaint against Rebel Coal Company. The request acknowledged that the monetary damages, costs, and attorney's fees previously ordered had been paid in full. Judge Gary Melick allowed the withdrawal under the Commission's procedural rule and dismissed the case. This order states no payment amount and makes no new ruling on the discrimination claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited rule: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11, governing withdrawal of a pleading.
  • Outcome: Withdrawal allowed and case dismissed after acknowledgment of full payment of the ordered damages, costs, and fees.
  • Key point: The dismissal followed satisfaction of the prior payment order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. REBEL COAL
DDATE:
19840113
TTEXT:
~57

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEVA 80-532-D
ON BEHALF OF
GERALD D. BOONE,
HOPE CD 80-67
COMPLAINANTS
V.

REBEL COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appearances: Edward H. Fitch, Esq., and Robert A. Cohen, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Depart- ment of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for
Complainants;
Douglas D. Wilson, Esq., Gardner, Moss,
Brown & Rocovich, Roanoke, Virginia, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

The Complainant on behalf of Gerald Boone requests approval to withdraw the Complaint in the captioned case acknowledging receipt in full of the monetary damages, costs, and attorney's fees ordered by the undersigned to be paid. Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is granted. 29 CFR 2700.11. The case is therefore dismissed.

Gary Melick
Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace