Ronald H. McCracken v. Valley Camp Coal Company (Commission decision, May 28, 1980)
McCracken v. Valley Camp Coal (FMSHRC WEVA 79-116-D): New evidence claim remanded
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Ronald H. McCracken petitioned for discretionary review in his case against Valley Camp Coal Company. He claimed that newly discovered evidence warranted reopening the record and further proceedings. The Commission granted review and sent the case back to the ALJ for a ruling on that claim. It did not decide whether to reopen the record or grant other relief.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: No mine safety standard is cited in this order.
- Outcome: Review granted and case remanded to the ALJ; no penalty or other relief decided.
- Key point: The ALJ must decide whether the claimed new evidence warrants reopening the record.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
RONALD MCCRACKEN V. VALLEY CAMP COAL
DDATE:
19800528
TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
May 28, 1980
RONALD H. McCRACKEN
v. Docket No. WEVA 79-116-D
VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER
The petition for discretionary review filed by Mr. McCracken is granted. The case is remanded to the administrative law judge for a ruling on Mr. McCracken's claim that newly-discovered evidence warrants re-opening of the record and further proceedings.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace