Ronald H. McCracken v. Valley Camp Coal Company (Commission decision, May 28, 1980)

McCracken v. Valley Camp Coal (FMSHRC WEVA 79-116-D): New evidence claim remanded

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEVA 79-116-D
Decided
May 28, 1980
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission granted McCracken's petition for discretionary review and remanded the case to the ALJ. The ALJ was directed to rule on McCracken's claim concerning newly discovered evidence; this order did not resolve that claim or the underlying case. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Ronald H. McCracken petitioned for discretionary review in his case against Valley Camp Coal Company. He claimed that newly discovered evidence warranted reopening the record and further proceedings. The Commission granted review and sent the case back to the ALJ for a ruling on that claim. It did not decide whether to reopen the record or grant other relief.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: No mine safety standard is cited in this order.
  • Outcome: Review granted and case remanded to the ALJ; no penalty or other relief decided.
  • Key point: The ALJ must decide whether the claimed new evidence warrants reopening the record.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
RONALD MCCRACKEN V. VALLEY CAMP COAL
DDATE:
19800528
TTEXT:

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
May 28, 1980

RONALD H. McCRACKEN

v. Docket No. WEVA 79-116-D

VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY

DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER

The petition for discretionary review filed by Mr. McCracken is granted. The case is remanded to the administrative law judge for a ruling on Mr. McCracken's claim that newly-discovered evidence warrants re-opening of the record and further proceedings.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace