Secretary of Labor v. Consol Mining Company LLC
Secretary of Labor v. Consol Mining Company LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2023-0141): Interlocutory review was granted
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Administrative Law Judge certified questions for interlocutory review before issuing a final decision in the case. Commission Rule 76 permits this early review when a ruling presents a controlling legal question and immediate review would materially advance the proceeding. The Commission found those conditions satisfied and granted review. The order does not identify the certified questions or decide their merits.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76
- Outcome: The request for interlocutory Commission review was granted.
- Key point: The Commission may review a nonfinal ruling when the certified legal question is controlling and immediate review will materially advance the case.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
CONSOL
MINING COMPANY LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. WEVA 2023-0141
BEFORE: Jordan,
Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, and Baker, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This
case arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On July 7, 2023, the Administrative Law Judge
assigned to this matter issued an order granting certification of questions for
interlocutory review.
Pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 76,
29 C.F.R. § 2700.76, the Commission may review a Judge’s ruling, prior to the
Judge’s final decision in the case, if certain conditions are met. This
includes a Judge certifying that his interlocutory ruling involves a controlling
question of law and that immediate review will materially advance the final
disposition of the proceeding.
We find that the qualifications contained
in Procedural Rule 76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76, have been met, and hereby GRANT
interlocutory review.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary
Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/
William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco
M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
/s/
Timothy J. Baker
Timothy
J. Baker, Commissioner
Distribution:
Emily Toler Scott
Counsel for
Appellate Litigation
U.S. Department of
Labor
Office of the
Solicitor
Division of Mine
Safety & Health
201 12th Street
South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
Robert S. Wilson
Office of the
Solicitor
U.S. Department of
Labor, MSHA
201 12 th
Street, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202
D. Cass Trent, CLR
U.S. Department of
Labor, MSHA
4499 Appalachian
Hwy
Pineville, WV 24874
Jim McHugh
Hardy Pence LLC
10 Hale Street, 4 th
Floor
P.O. Box 2548
Charleston, WV 25329
Craig Aaron
CONSOL Energy Inc.
275 Technolgy
Drive, Suite 101
Canonsburg, PA 15317
Michael G. Young
Administrative Law
Judge
Federal Mine
Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of the
Chief Administrative Law Judge
1331 Pennsylvania
Ave, NW, Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2023. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.