Secretary of Labor v. U.S. Silica (Commission decision, January 5, 2021)
Secretary of Labor v. U.S. Silica (FMSHRC WEVA 2020-0270): Reopening request dismissed after counsel declined to proceed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Commission had ordered U.S. Silica to explain why its motion to reopen should not be denied because of an unexplained filing delay. The next day, company counsel stated that the operator did not intend to file anything further and would allow the show-cause order to become final. The Commission therefore denied the reopening motion. It dismissed the matter with prejudice.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 813(a)
- Outcome: The motion to reopen was denied and the docket was dismissed with prejudice.
- Key point: An operator that declines to answer a show-cause order cannot continue pursuing reopening.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
U.S. SILICA
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEVA 2020-0270
A.C. No. 46-02805-499009
BEFORE: Rajkovich, Chairman; Althen and Traynor, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). The Commission has received a motion from the operator seeking to reopen a penalty assessment which had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 813(a). On December 14, 2020, the Commission issued an order to show cause within 20 days why the Commission should not deny the motion to reopen and dismiss the docket for an unexplained delay in filing the motion.
On December 15, 2020, the Commission received an email from counsel for the operator stating that it did not intend to file a further motion and would allow the Commission’s December 14 order to become final. Consistent with that order, the motion to reopen has been denied and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich,
Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Chairman
/s/ William I. Althen
William I.
Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Arthur R.
Traynor, III
Arthur R.
Traynor, III, Commissioner
Distribution (email)
Michael Peelish
Attorney for U.S. Silica
Law Firm of Adele L. Abrams, PLLC
John M. McCracken
Senior Trial Attorney
Office of the Solicitor
Mine Safety and Health Division
U.S. Department of Labor
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Glenn Voisin
Federal Mine Safety & Health
Review Commission
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty
Compliance
Mine Safety and Health
Administration
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace