Secretary of Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal, LLC (Commission decision, April 5, 2016)
Secretary of Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal, LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2016-0061): Unexplained processing error excused and assessment reopened
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Eastern Associated Coal missed the 30-day deadline to contest a proposed penalty assessment, attributing the failure to an undetermined clerical, mailing, or internal processing error. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but cautioned that the operator's office procedures were inadequate. Guided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and the preference for resolving cases on their merits, the Commission reopened the final assessment in the interest of justice and remanded for penalty proceedings. It directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28
- Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and the matter was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: A defaulted assessment may be reopened for excusable processing error even when the operator's procedures warrant correction.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR, :
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) :
:
: Docket No. WEVA 2016-0061
v.
: A.C. No. 46-06448-389549
:
EASTERN
ASSOCIATED COAL, LLC :
BEFORE:
Jordan, Chairman; Young and Althen, Commissioners[1]
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This matter
arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On October 6, 2015, the Commission received from Eastern Associated Coal (“Eastern Associated”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the
Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on August 17, 2015, and became a final order of the Commission on September 16, 2015. Eastern Associated asserts that it its failure to timely contest the proposed assessment was due to an “undetermined clerical or mailing error . . . [or a] a mistaken or otherwise inadvertent internal processing error.” The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen. However, he states that his decision not to do so in this case should not be construed as condoning the operator’s inadequate office procedures. The Secretary urges Eastern Associated to take proposed assessments seriously in the future.
Having
reviewed Eastern Associated’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young,
Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I.
Althen, Commissioner
[1] This case has
been delegated to a panel of three Commissioners pursuant to section 113(c) of the Mine Act for the limited purpose of assessing the merits of the motion to reopen. 30 U.S.C. § 823(c).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace