Secretary of Labor v. Elk Run Coal Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, May 15, 2014)
Secretary of Labor v. Elk Run Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2014-485): Escapeway-map citation modified in $7,205 settlement
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2014 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Elk Run Coal Company and the Secretary proposed settling three citations by reducing total penalties from $11,807 to $7,205. The agreement changed an escapeway-map citation from reasonably likely and S&S to unlikely and non-S&S because the miners worked on the active section, knew the current locations, and could see the refuge alternative and self-contained self-rescuer cache near the map. The other two citations and their penalties remained unchanged. Chief Judge Robert J. Lesnick struck two portions of the settlement motion that he found misstated settlement law, but approved the agreement under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. Elk Run was ordered to pay $7,205 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 820(i) and 820(k)
- Outcome: One citation was modified to non-S&S, the remaining citations were unchanged, and the $7,205 settlement was approved.
- Key point: Mine-specific facts about miners' knowledge and nearby emergency equipment supported reducing the gravity of the inaccurate escapeway-map citation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE:
202-434-9958 / FAX: 202-434-9949
May 15, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Petitioner
v.
ELK RUN COAL COMPANY, INC.,
Respondent
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEVA 2014-485
A.C. No. 46-08553-341181
Mine: Black King I North Portal
ORDER ACCEPTING
APPEARANCE
DECISION
APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO MODIFY
ORDER TO PAY
Before: Judge Lesnick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of a civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(d).
The Secretary of Labor’s Conference and Litigation Representative (“CLR”) filed a notice of limited appearance with the penalty petition. It is ORDERED that the CLR be accepted to represent the Secretary. Cyprus Emerald Res. Corp., 16 FMSHRC 2359 (Nov. 1994).
The CLR has filed a motion to approve settlement. A reduction in the penalties from $11,807.00 to $7,205.00 is proposed. The CLR also requests that Citation No. 8155239 be modified to reduce the likelihood of injury or illness from “reasonably likely” to “unlikely,” and to delete the significant and substantial designation. The CLR justifies the modification by stating:
Respondent would
have argued at hearing for modification of Citation No. 8155239's gravity designations because, Respondent claims, the condition cited was for the escapeway map at the section power center not showing the correct location of the mine faces, refuge alternative or the scsr storage locations, yet he further states that this escapeway map is located in close proximity to the current mine faces and all miners affected by the escapeway map actually work and travel on the active section and know the current location. He also states that this map is always stored at the section power center and miners can actually see the refuge alternative and scsr storage cache while reviewing the map, which lowers the likelihood of this condition causing injury.
While the Secretary does not admit the relevancy or significance of the Respondent’s arguments, the Secretary agrees to modify the citation. The remaining citations and penalties are unchanged.
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), I strike paragraphs three and four from the Secretary's Motion as immaterial and impertinent to the issues legitimately before the Commission.[1] The paragraphs incorrectly cite and interpret the case law and misrepresent the statute, regulations and Congressional intent regarding settlements under the Mine Act. Instead, I have evaluated the proposed settlement in accordance with sections 110(i) and 110(k) of the Act.
I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act. The settlement amounts are as follows:
Citation No.
Proposed
Settlement
8155239
$6,458.00
$1,856.00
9005633
$3,405.00
$3,405.00
9005634
$1,944.00
$1,944.00
$11,807.00
$7,205.00
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED.
It is ORDERED that Citation No. 8155239 be MODIFIED to reduce the likelihood of injury or illness from “reasonably likely” to “unlikely,” and to delete the significant and substantial designation.
It is further ORDERED that the operator pay a total penalty of $7,205.00 within thirty days of this order.[2] Upon receipt of payment, this case is DISMISSED.
/s/ Robert J. Lesnick
Robert J. Lesnick
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Donald K. Phillips, Conference & Litigation
Representative, U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA, 100 Bluestone Road, Mt. Hope, WV 25880-1000
Eric Silkwood, Esq., Hardy Pence, PLLC, P.O. Box 2548, Charleston, WV 25329
/tjr
[1]
The Secretary’s Motion for Decision and Order Approving Settlement reads in pertinent part:
3. In
reaching this settlement, the Secretary has evaluated the value of the compromise, the likelihood of obtaining a still better settlement, the prospects of coming out better, or worse, after a full trial, and the resources that would need to be expended in the attempt. The Secretary has determined that the public interest and the effective enforcement and deterrent purposes of the Mine Act are best served by settling the citation as indicated above.
4. Consistent
with the position the Secretary has taken before the Commission in The American Coal Company, LAKE 2011-13, the Secretary believes that the pleadings in this case and the above summary give the Commission an adequate basis for exercising its authority to review and approve the Secretary's settlement under Section 110(k) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(k).
[2]
Payment should be sent to: Mine Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Payment Office, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, MO 63179-0390.
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace