Secretary of Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal, LLC
Secretary of Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal, LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2014-2171): Clerical or mailing error supported reopening
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Eastern Associated Coal failed to contest a proposed penalty assessment within 30 days and said an undetermined clerical or mailing error caused the default. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but described the operator's office procedures as inadequate or sloppy and urged greater care. Guided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and the principle that default is a harsh remedy, the Commission reopened the assessment in the interest of justice. It remanded the case and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28
- Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and the matter was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: An unexplained clerical or mailing error may justify reopening, although the operator remains responsible for improving deficient office procedures.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR, :
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) :
:
: Docket No. WEVA 2014-2171
v.
: A.C. No. 46-05295-354307
:
EASTERN
ASSOCIATED COAL, LLC :
BEFORE:
Jordan, Chairman; Young and Althen, Commissioners[1]
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This matter
arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801
et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On September 10, 2014, the Commission received
from Eastern
Associated Coal (“Eastern Associated”) a motion seeking to reopen a
penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be
reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep.
Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the
Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate
that the proposed assessment was delivered on June 26, 2014, and became a final
order of the Commission on July 28, 2014. Eastern Associated asserts that it its
failure to timely contest the proposed assessment was due to an “undetermined
clerical or mailing error.” The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
However, he states that his decision not to do so in this case should not be
construed as condoning the operator’s inadequate or sloppy office procedures. The
Secretary urges Eastern Associated to take proposed assessments seriously in
the future.
Having
reviewed Eastern Associated’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the
interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and
the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent
with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of
penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. §
2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young,
Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I.
Althen, Commissioner
[1] This case has
been delegated to a panel of three Commissioners pursuant to section 113(c) of
the Mine Act for the limited purpose of assessing the merits of the motion to
reopen. 30 U.S.C. § 823(c).
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2016. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.