Secretary of Labor v. Gateway Eagle Coal Company (Commission decision, April 30, 2015)
Secretary of Labor v. Gateway Eagle Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 2014-1): One-day mail-sorting delay excused
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Gateway Eagle Coal filed its MSHA penalty contest one day after the assessment became a final Commission order. The company attributed the delay to an internal mail-sorting error. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged Gateway to improve its procedures for future 30-day deadlines. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interest of justice and remanded the case for proceedings on the merits. It directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: The one-day-late final assessment was reopened and remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: A one-day delay caused by an internal mail-sorting error may support reopening when the Secretary does not oppose.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
GATEWAY EAGLE COAL COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No.
A.C. No.
WEVA 2014-1
46-08637-329022
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Nakamura, and Althen, Commissioners[1]
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On October 15, 2013, the Commission received from Gateway Eagle Coal Company (“Gateway”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine
Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in
appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on August 8, 2013, and became a final order of the Commission on September 9, 2013. Gateway asserts that due to an internal mail sorting error, the Notice of Contest was filed on September 10, 2013. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, and urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.
Having reviewed Gateway’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G.
Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K.
Nakamura, Commissioner
/s/ William I. Althen
William I.
Althen, Commissioner
[1]
Commissioner Cohen has elected not
to participate in this matter.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace