Secretary of Labor v. Inman Energy, Process Energy, Spartan Mining Company, Inc., and Aracoma Coal Company

Plain-English summary

Four Alpha Natural Resources subsidiaries asked the Commission to reopen five MSHA penalty assessments that had become final after late contests. Alpha's executive assistant said she handled contest filings for acquired Legacy Massey Energy mines and fell behind because of a holiday break and increased work connected to the Massey settlement. Inman Energy and Process Energy filed their contests several days late, while Alpha discovered the Spartan Mining and Aracoma Coal delinquencies months later. The Secretary did not oppose reopening, although MSHA had already received payment for the Inman and Process penalties, and warned that future late-contest motions might be opposed. The Commission reopened all five assessments and remanded them for penalty proceedings.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
• Outcome: Five final assessments were reopened and remanded for penalty proceedings.
• Key point: A temporary workload failure during post-acquisition processing supported unopposed reopening, but the operators were warned about future late filings.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710

January 31, 2013

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

INMAN ENERGY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2012-768

A.C. No. 46-09244-275668

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

PROCESS ENERGY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. KENT 2012-653

A.C. No. 15-19097-273454

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

SPARTAN MINING COMPANY, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2012-1199

46-08808-276806

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

ARACOMA COAL COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2012-1198
A.C. No. 46-08801-276805

Docket No. WEVA 2012-1200

A.C. No. 46-09299-276820

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

These matters arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On February 24, March 2, and May 22, 2012, the
Commission received from Inman Energy (“Inman”), Process Energy (“Process”), Spartan
Mining Company, Inc. (“Spartan”), and Aracoma Coal Company (“Aracoma”) (collectively “the
operators”) five motions seeking to reopen five penalty assessments that had become final orders
of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Alpha
Natural Resources (“Alpha”) is the parent company of all of the operators seeking relief in this
case.

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed
penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment
is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to
reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a).
Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to
reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief
from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable
by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed
that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause
for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the
merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

MSHA’s record indicates that Inman’s proposed assessment was delivered on
December 21, 2011, and became a final order of the Commission on January 20, 2012. Inman
asserts that it filed its notice of contest on January 24, 2012, and was unaware of its delinquency
until it received MSHA’s notice, dated February 1, 2012. Process asserts that it received the
proposed assessment on December 5, 2011, and it became a final order of the Commission on
January 4, 2012. Process states that it filed its notice of contest on January 12, 2012, and
received MSHA’s delinquency notice on February 6, 2012. Spartan and Aracoma assert that they
received the proposed assessments on January 9, 2012, which became final orders of the
Commission on February 8, 2012. Alpha’s executive assistant discovered Spartan and
Aracoma’s delinquencies on May 8, 2012.

In affidavits filed in all dockets, Alpha’s executive assistant stated that she is responsible
for processing and filing notices of contest for all Legacy Massey Energy (“Massey”) mines
acquired by Alpha. She stated that this processing system has prevented any late filings in the
past, but due to a holiday break and the increasing workload regarding the Massey settlement, she
was unable to file timely contests in these matters.

The Secretary does not oppose the requests to reopen, and notes that MSHA received
payments for Inman and Process’ uncontested penalties by checks dated January 6 and 19, 2012.
The Secretary cautions that she may oppose future motions to reopen penalty assessments that
are not contested in a timely manner.

Having reviewed the operators’ requests and the Secretary’s responses, in the interests of
justice, we hereby reopen these matters and remand them to the Chief Administrative Law Judge
for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29
C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for
assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

/s/ Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Dennis Smith, Esq.

Spilman, Thomas & Battle, PLLC

P.O. Box 273

Charleston, WV 25301

Carol Ann Marunich, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP

215 Don Knotts Blvd., Suite 310

Morgantown, WV 26501

[email protected]

[email protected]

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. Of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N

Washington, D.C. 20004-1710