Secretary of Labor v. Glen Alum Operations, LLC (Commission decision, November 5, 2013)
Secretary of Labor v. Glen Alum Operations, LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2011-2202): Timely filings prevented default
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Glen Alum Operations asked to reopen a penalty proceeding after an apparent failure to answer led to a show-cause order. The operator produced an answer that the Commission had date-stamped shortly after the Secretary filed the penalty petition and an email sent three days after the show-cause order. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. Because Glen Alum timely responded to the show-cause order, the Commission held that the default never effectively became final and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.; Commission Procedural Rules
- Outcome: The purported default was held ineffective, and the penalty case was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: Timely proof of both an answer and a show-cause response prevents an apparent default from becoming final.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Jean Ellen
Normal
Jean Ellen
2
2
2013-11-25T19:58:00Z
2013-11-25T19:58:00Z
3
472
2694
Microsoft
22
6
3160
14.00
Clean
Clean
false
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
November
5, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
GLEN ALUM OPERATIONS, LLC
Docket No. WEVA 2011-2202
A.C. No. 46-08812-260211
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, Nakamura, and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On May 2, 2013, the Commission received from Glen Alum Operations, LLC (“Glen Alum”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the default order entered against it.
On August 13, 2012, the Chief
Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Glen Alum’s perceived failure to answer the Secretary’s September 1, 2011 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty.
Glen Alum asserts that it timely
answered the penalty petition and submits a copy of the answer date-stamped by the Commission as received on September 23, 2011. Glen Alum also submits a copy of its email to the Commission on August 16, 2012, in response to the Show Cause Order. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
Having reviewed Glen Alum’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the Default Order did not effectively become a final order of the Commission because the operator filed a timely response to the Show Cause Order. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Craig W. Hundley, Esq.
Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, PLLC
200 Capitol Street
P.O. Box 3843
Charleston, WV 25338-3843
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace