Secretary of Labor v. Consolidation Coal Co. and McElroy Coal Co.
Secretary of Labor v. Consolidation Coal Co. and McElroy Coal Co. (FMSHRC WEVA 2011-1314, et al.): $3.31 million global settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2015 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This global settlement covered 1,753 citations and orders in 132 civil-penalty dockets from five northern West Virginia underground coal mines acquired by Murray Energy from CONSOL Energy in December 2013. The citations had proposed penalties totaling $5,097,611 and addressed common underground-mine issues including accumulations, roof and rib control, ventilation and roof-control plans, electrical conditions, preshift examinations, and safeguards. The parties agreed to affirm the affected citations and orders as issued while reducing some penalties to account for factual and legal defenses and the change in mine ownership. Two flagrant-violation designations were removed, with each related order settled at the $70,000 maximum penalty. Judge Janet G. Harner approved total penalties of $3,313,477, payable in four installments over 360 days, and ordered dismissal after payment was complete.
Decision snapshot
- Common cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.202, 75.220, 75.360, 75.370, 75.400, 75.517, and 75.1403
- Outcome: A global settlement resolving 1,753 citations and orders in 132 dockets was approved for $3,313,477.
- Key point: A large global settlement may preserve the citations as issued while reducing penalties to reflect litigation risk, changed ownership, and the statutory penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
7 PARKWAY CENTER,
SUITE 290
875 GREENTREE ROAD
PITTSBURGH, PA 15220
TELEPHONE: 412-920-7240
/ FAX: 412-928-8689
SECRETARY
OF LABOR
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA),
Petitioner
v.
CONSOLIDATION
COAL CO. AND MCELROY COAL CO.,
Respondents
CIVIL
PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
Docket
No. WEVA 2011-1314, et al.[1]
A.C.
No. 46-01318-249156
Mine:
Robinson Run No. 95
Mine
ID: 46-01318
Mine:
Blacksville No. 2
Mine
ID: 46-01968
Mine:
Shoemaker
Mine
ID: 46-01436
Mine:
Loveridge No. 22
Mine
ID: 46-01433
Mine:
McElroy
Mine
ID: 46-01437
ORDER OF
CONSOLIDATION
AMENDED DECISION
APPROVING GLOBAL SETTLEMENT[2]
ORDER TO DISMISS
ORDER TO PAY
Before:
Judge Harner
These
cases concern proposals for assessment of civil penalties filed pursuant to
Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§815(d) (“Act”), seeking civil penalty assessments for alleged violations of
mandatory safety and health standards. This decision concerns 132 civil penalty
dockets, including 1753 citations and orders, with proposed penalties totaling
$5,097,611.00. The parties have negotiated and submitted a proposed settlement
that seeks to resolve all affected citations and orders contained in these 132
dockets. It is ORDERED that these cases are CONSOLIDATED for
purposes of settlement.
On December 6, 2013, Murray Energy
Company (“Murray”) acquired five northern West Virginia underground mines from
CONSOL Energy, Inc. (“CONSOL”). The five mines that were acquired are
Blacksville No. 2 (Mine ID: 46-01968), Loveridge (Mine ID: 46-01433), McElroy (Mine
ID: 46-01437), Robinson Run (Mine ID: 46-01318), and Shoemaker (Mine ID:
46-01436) (collectively referred to as the “CONSOL Mines”). The Secretary
issued citations/orders to the CONSOL Mines on or before December 6, 2013 and
this global settlement resolves those citations/orders (“affected
citations/orders”).
The Secretary attached three exhibits to
his Motion to Approve Global Settlement. Exhibit 1 contains a summary of
the 132 dockets included in this global settlement. Exhibit 2 contains a
listing of all citations/orders in 110 fully resolved dockets. Exhibit 3
contains 22 dockets and the citations/orders in them that were issued on or
before December 6, 2013. These 22 dockets also contain additional
citations/orders issued after that date.[3]
The parties have agreed that the
affected citations/orders shall be affirmed as set forth herein and that a
civil penalty shall be assessed for each affected citation/order as set forth
in Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3. The facts surrounding each violation
are set forth in the body of each affected citation/order, copies of which were
attached as part of Exhibit A to the Secretary’s Petitions. The Secretary has
considered the deterrent effect of such penalties taking into account that the
CONSOL Mines were not owned or controlled by Murray when the affected
citations/orders were issued. The violations were abated in good faith. The
operator’s history of previous violations and size are contained in Exhibit A
which was attached to the Petition for each case when filed by the Secretary. The
Respondent agrees that final assessment of the agreed upon penalties will not
adversely affect the operator's ability to continue in business. The gravity of
each violation and the operator’s negligence are set forth in the body of each
citation/order. In reaching this agreement on the total penalty amount, the
parties reviewed and considered the allegations contained in the 1753 affected
citations/orders which are contained in the 132 dockets at issue here and
present the following in support of this Motion:
Negligence:
The parties have reviewed the affected
citations/orders in the 132 Dockets affected by this global settlement. The
affected citations/orders generally encompass violations that are often issued
by MSHA in underground coal mines, including violations issued for the
following standards: 30 C.F.R. §75.400 - combustible accumulations, 30 C.F.R.
§75.202 - roof and rib control, 30 C.F.R. §75.370 and 30 C.F.R. §75.220 -
ventilation plan and roof control plan, 30 C.F.R. §75.517 – electrical, 30
C.F.R. §75.360 –pre-shift examinations and 30 C.F.R. §75.1403 – safeguard
notices, for example. The parties agree that the respondent will accept all
affected citations/orders as issued, despite the existence of good faith
factual and legal disputes. The parties agree however, that the Respondent
shall pay civil penalties which, while lower than proposed, are commensurate
with the respondent’s assertions in each of the dockets. Specifically,
Respondent has raised issues concerning the designated level of negligence and
the evidence the Secretary relied on to support high and moderate negligence
designations for certain conditions. For certain citations/orders, Respondent
asserts, for example, that management could not be in a position to know, nor
could they have known, of conditions that existed for a short period of time,
were in remote areas of the mine, had just occurred, or were not noted on
examinations. The Secretary reviewed the evidence in light of Respondents’
assertions. The parties agree that all affected citations/orders shall be
affirmed as issued, regarding the negligence findings alleged, and that in some
instances a modest reduction in penalty is appropriate.
Gravity:
Gravity findings include the likelihood
of injury or illness, the type of injury or illness, whether the gravity is
significant and substantial and the number of persons affected. The parties
reviewed the gravity findings in the 1753 affected citations/orders. As would
be expected given the volume, Respondent raised factual issues in whole or in
part with regard to the gravity findings alleged in many of the affected
citations/orders. The Respondent raised factual and evidentiary concerns
surrounding whether some of the conditions alleged would be reasonably likely
or highly likely to lead to a permanently disabling or fatal injury and whether
the number of persons identified would be affected by the hazard cited. Additionally,
Respondent contends that there are several instances where the evidence does
not fully support the likelihood of injury identified on the face of the citation
or order. Those questions arise, for example, when evaluating the likelihood of
miners to be permanently or fatally injured for minor or technical violations
of the ventilation plan or roof control plan or whether an inadequate pre-shift
examination would result in a fatal injury to one or more miners. Finally,
based on many of the same factors, the Respondent raised concerns regarding the
significant and substantial designation for certain hazards including whether
the limited exposure of miners would contribute to a serious injury or death
should normal mining operations continue. After reviewing the evidence
presented by the Secretary and the Respondent, the parties agree that the
affected citations/orders should be affirmed as issued. The Secretary has agreed
to a reduction in penalty for some of the affected citations/orders in
recognition of the defenses raised by the Respondent should the violations
proceed to a hearing on the merits.
Finally, Order No. 8038342 contained in
Docket No. WEVA 2012-995 and Order No. 7114564 contained in Docket No. WEVA
2013-800 were designated as flagrant violations for assessment purposes
pursuant to § 110(a)(2) of the Mine Act. The Secretary agrees to remove that
designation for the purposes of this settlement and to resolve those Orders at
the maximum penalty of $70,000.00 each.
I have considered the representations
and documentation submitted, find that the settlement is reasonable as set
forth in the motion to approve settlement, and conclude that the proposed
settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the
Act. In deciding to approve this settlement agreement, I note the following:
the violations of the Act set forth in the affected citations/orders were not
committed while the mines were under Murray’s control; the settlement will
allow the parties to move forward and concentrate on future safety, health, and
compliance in order to benefit the miners who work at these five mines; and the
settlement will avoid protracted litigation that would occur if the cases were
not resolved. While the Respondent is paying less than the amounts originally
assessed by the Secretary, I deem that the amounts are reasonable under all of
the circumstances herein.
The motion to approve settlement is GRANTED,
all representations are accepted as set forth in the motion, and Respondent is
hereby ORDERED to pay the Secretary of Labor the sum of $3,313,477.00
according to the following payment schedule:
Within 30 days of this decision,
Respondent will pay $1,000,000.00. Respondent will make a second payment of
$1,000,000.00 within 120 days of the date of this decision. Respondent will
make a third payment of $1,000,000.00 within 240 days of this decision.
Respondent will make a fourth and final payment of $313,477.00 on or before 360
days from the date of this decision.[4]
The parties further agree that if Respondent fails to make any payment in
accordance with the terms herein, any remaining penalty due becomes payable in
full immediately upon default. Upon the completion of the payment schedule,
these cases are DISMISSED.
/s/ Janet G. Harner
Janet
G. Harner
Administrative
Law Judge
Distribution:
Dana
L. Ferguson, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, MSH Division,
201 12th St. South, Suite 500, Arlington, VA22202
Eric
Silkwood, Esq., Hardy Pence, 500 Lee St. East, Suite 701, Charleston, WV 25301
Docket
No.
Mine
Full
/ Partial
Number of Citations in Docket
Number of Citations Settling
WEVA 2011-1314
Harrison/Robinson
F
19
19
WEVA 2011-2248
Marion/Loveridge
F
14
14
WEVA 2011-900
Harrison/Robinson
F
11
11
WEVA 2012-1052
Marshall/McElroy
F
53
53
WEVA 2012-1115
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
3
3
WEVA 2012-1143
Marion/Loveridge
F
2
2
WEVA 2012-1193
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-1194
Marshall/McElroy
F
70
70
WEVA 2012-1256
Harrison/Robinson
F
2
2
WEVA 2012-1257
Harrison/Robinson
F
9
9
WEVA 2012-1258
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
3
3
WEVA 2012-1460
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-1489
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-1642
Harrison/Robinson
F
19
19
WEVA 2012-213
Harrison/Robinson
F
10
10
WEVA 2012-322
Marshall/McElroy
F
18
18
WEVA 2012-471
Marshall/McElroy
F
41
41
WEVA 2012-512
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-634
Marshall/McElroy
F
15
15
WEVA 2012-706
Harrison/Robinson
F
11
11
WEVA 2012-772
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-773
Marshall/McElroy
F
14
14
WEVA 2012-827
Harrison/Robinson
F
18
18
WEVA 2012-873
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-874
Marshall/McElroy
F
22
22
WEVA 2012-97
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-973
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2012-974
Marion/Loveridge
F
5
5
WEVA 2012-975
Marshall/McElroy
F
13
13
WEVA 2012-98
Marshall/McElroy
F
36
36
WEVA 2012-995
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-50
Harrison/Robinson
F
22
22
WEVA 2013-51
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-52
Marion/Loveridge
F
26
26
WEVA 2013-1008
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-1028
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-1029
Marshall/McElroy
F
40
40
WEVA 2013-1060
Mon/blacksville
F
10
10
WEVA 2013-1079
Marion/Loveridge
F
3
3
WEVA 2013-1080
Marion/Loveridge
F
3
3
WEVA 2013-1087
Harrison/Robinson
F
13
13
WEVA 2013-1088
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
17
17
WEVA 2013-1132
Marshall/McElroy
F
3
3
WEVA 2013-1133
Marshall/McElroy
F
53
53
WEVA 2013-1134
Harrison/Robinson
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-1156
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
12
12
WEVA 2013-1167
Harrison/Robinson
F
16
16
WEVA 2013-1201
Mon/blacksville
F
31
31
WEVA 2013-1213
Marion/Loveridge
F
39
39
WEVA 2013-1226
Marshall/McElroy
F
23
23
WEVA 2013-1251
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
5
5
WEVA 2013-1286
Harrison/Robinson
F
7
7
WEVA 2013-1287
Marion/Loveridge
F
2
2
WEVA 2013-1288
Marion/Loveridge
F
23
23
WEVA 2013-1291
Mon/blacksville
F
27
27
WEVA 2013-1340
Marshall/McElroy
F
16
16
WEVA 2013-397
Harrison/Robinson
F
2
2
WEVA 2013-451
Harrison/Robinson
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-501
Mon/blacksville
F
30
30
WEVA 2013-571
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-572
Marshall/McElroy
F
22
22
WEVA 2013-573
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
2
2
WEVA 2013-574
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
8
8
WEVA 2013-584
Harrison/Robinson
F
9
9
WEVA 2013-636
Marshall/McElroy
F
29
29
WEVA 2013-672
Marshall/McElroy
F
11
11
WEVA 2013-695
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-696
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
20
20
WEVA 2013-698
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-707
Harrison/Robinson
F
2
2
WEVA 2013-708
Harrison/Robinson
F
27
27
WEVA 2013-790
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-791
Marshall/McElroy
F
26
26
WEVA 2013-800
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
1
1
WEVA 2013-838
Mon/blacksville
F
61
61
WEVA 2013-883
Harrison/Robinson
F
16
16
WEVA 2013-929
Marshall/McElroy
F
27
27
WEVA 2013-936
Marion/Loveridge
F
3
3
WEVA 2013-956
Harrison/Robinson
F
14
14
WEVA 2013-960
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
8
8
WEVA 2014-9
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
3
3
WEVA 2014-25
Harrison/Robinson
F
17
17
WEVA 2014-29
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-38
Marion/Loveridge
F
24
24
WEVA 2014-73
Mon/blacksville
F
33
33
WEVA 2014-189
Harrison/Robinson
F
53
53
WEVA 2014-199
Harrison/Robinson
F
29
29
WEVA 2014-217
Ohio/Shoemaker
F
16
16
WEVA 2014-231
Marion/Loveridge
F
36
36
WEVA 2014-298
Mon/blacksville
F
10
10
WEVA 2014-352
Marshall/McElroy
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-353
Marshall/McElroy
F
32
32
WEVA 2014-540
Harrison/Robinson
F
10
10
WEVA 2014-542
Marion/Loveridge
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-566
Marshall/McElroy
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-623
Harrison/Robinson
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-698
Mon/blacksville
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-741
Marshall/McElroy
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-771
Mon/blacksville
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-799
Marion/Loveridge
F
5
5
WEVA 2014-800
Marion/Loveridge
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-801
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-895
Marion/Loveridge
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-912
Harrison/Robinson
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-1032
Marshall/McElroy
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-2041
Mon/blacksville
F
1
1
WEVA 2014-2042
Mon/blacksville
F
2
2
WEVA 2014-2040
Mon/blacksville
F
5
5
WEVA 2014-1044
Mon/blacksville
F
30
30
WEVA 2014-786
Mon/blacksville
F
30
30
WEVA 2012-1118
Mon/blacksville
F
17
17
WEVA 2012-937
Mon/blacksville
P
19
4
WEVA 2014-541
Marion/Loveridge
P
51
50
WEVA 2014-543
Ohio/Shoemaker
P
15
14
WEVA 2014-567
Marshall/McElroy
P
31
22
WEVA 2014-624
Harrison/Robinson
P
8
2
WEVA 2014-625
Ohio/Shoemaker
P
25
12
WEVA 2014-653
Marion/Loveridge
P
20
8
WEVA 2014-740
Marshall/McElroy
P
14
5
WEVA 2014-770
Harrison/Robinson
P
11
2
WEVA 2014-772
Mon/blacksville
P
25
14
WEVA 2014-784
Marion/Loveridge
P
46
24
WEVA 2014-808
Mon/blacksville
P
8
5
WEVA 2014-835
Marshall/McElroy
P
39
4
WEVA 2014-872
Ohio/Shoemaker
P
73
42
WEVA 2014-913
Harrison/Robinson
P
26
2
WEVA 2014-943
Mon/blacksville
P
61
24
WEVA 2014-1017
Harrison/Robinson
P
15
1
WEVA 2014-1033
Marshall/McElroy
P
31
4
WEVA 2014-1110
Mon/blacksville
P
19
2
WEVA 2014-1124
Harrison/Robinson
P
13
1
WEVA 2011-2408
Marion/Loveridge
P
5
2
[1] All Docket
Numbers contained in this settlement are listed in Appendix A, attached hereto.
[2]
This
Decision is being amended solely to correct the A.C. No. for the lead docket,
Docket No. WEVA 2011-1314; and the footnote number regarding payment
information, now correctly reflected as footnote number 4.
[3] All of the
citations/orders issued after December 6, 2013, have been fully resolved by
Respondent and were the subject of Decisions Approving Partial Settlements.
[4] Payment should
be sent to: MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
PAYMENT OFFICE, P. O. BOX 790390, ST. LOUIS, MO 63179-0390
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2015, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.