Secretary of Labor obo Strattis v. ICG Beckley, LLC (ALJ decision, June 3, 2010)
Secretary of Labor obo Strattis v. ICG Beckley, LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2010-991-D): Temporary reinstatement date corrected
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2010 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Judge William B. Moran corrected a statement in his June 1, 2010 temporary-reinstatement order for Mr. Strattis. The earlier order mistakenly said reinstatement was effective on the date of discharge. The Judge explained that this would make the later discrimination proceeding pointless on the issue of back pay. He changed the effective date to June 1, 2010, and left every other part of the earlier order unchanged.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: No statutory or regulatory citation appears in this short modifying order.
- Outcome: Temporary reinstatement was made effective June 1, 2010, with all other terms unchanged.
- Key point: The temporary-reinstatement date did not reach back to the miner's discharge because back pay remained for the later discrimination proceeding.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FMSRHC ALJ DECISION
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE N.W., SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001
(202) 434-9950
June 3, 2010
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY & HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Applicant
v.
ICG BECKLEY, LLC,
Respondent
TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEVA 2010-991-D
HOPE CD 2010-06
Beckley Pocahontas Plant
Mine ID 46-09216
ORDER MODIFYING TERMS OF TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
Appearances:
Jessica R. Hughes, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, on behalf of the Applicant;
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on behalf of the Respondent.
Before: Judge Moran
The Court’s Order of June 1, 2010 is modified to correct the Court’s misstatement that Mr. Strattis’ reinstatement was “deemed effective as of the date of his discharge.” June 1, 2010 Order at 4. Obviously the Court should have stated that the reinstatement was effective as of the date of the June 1st Order. To state otherwise would make the subsequent discrimination proceeding pointless on the question of back pay. The Court apologizes for the confusion it created by misstating the date of reinstatement. All other aspects of the Court’s June 1st Order remain unchanged. Accordingly, Mr. Strattis’ reinstatement is deemed effective as of June 1, 2010.
William B. Moran
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Jessica R. Hughes, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor, Arlington, VA 22209-2247
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Three Gateway Center, 401 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1340, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace