Jaunt, Inc.
Jaunt, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2010-1284-M): Unserved show-cause order could not create a final default
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jaunt did not answer a civil-penalty petition, and a show-cause order was treated as becoming a default order after thirty days. The operator later said it did not understand that another answer was required after contesting the proposed assessment. The record also showed that Jaunt was omitted from the show-cause order's distribution list and the order was never mailed to it. The Commission held that the default never became final, remanded the case, and gave Jaunt thirty days to answer the show-cause order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.
- Outcome: The nonfinal default was set aside and the penalty case was remanded for further proceedings.
- Key point: A show-cause order that was never served on the operator cannot mature into a final default order.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
September 18, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
JAUNT, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEVA 2010-1284-M
A.C. No. 46-08262-221287
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 9, 2011, the Commission received from Jaunt,
Inc. (“Jaunt”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the
default order entered against it.
On March 18, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show
Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30
days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Jaunt’s failure to answer the
Secretary’s July 23, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did not
receive Jaunt’s answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on April 18, 2011.
Jaunt asserts that it was not aware it had to answer the penalty petition after it contested
the proposed assessment. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and notes that the
operator is not listed on the show cause order distribution list.
Having reviewed Jaunt’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice,
we conclude that the Default Order has not become a final order of the Commission because the
Order to Show Cause was never mailed to Jaunt. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the
Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Jaunt shall file an Answer to the Show
Cause Order within 30 days of the date of this order.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Jack Mullins, President
Jaunt Inc.,
P.O. Box 626
Chapmanville, WV 25508
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2012. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.