Secretary of Labor v. Kingwood Mining Company, LLC (Commission decision, October 7, 2016)
Secretary of Labor v. Kingwood Mining Company, LLC (FMSHRC WEVA 2009-857): Two final penalty assessments reopened to allow settlement
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Kingwood Mining Company asked the Commission to reopen two penalty assessments that had already become final orders under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, which happens automatically when an operator does not contest an assessment in time. The Secretary of Labor did not oppose the request and in fact asked the Commission to grant it, because reopening was the step needed to let the parties settle the assessments. The Commission granted the motion and sent both dockets back to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings under the Mine Act and the Commission's procedural rules. It directed the Secretary to file penalty petitions within 45 days under Commission Rule 28, and told the parties to file a motion to approve their settlement promptly after those petitions were filed. The order does not describe the underlying citations or explain why the original assessments went uncontested.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: Both final penalty assessments were reopened and the matter was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: An assessment that became final because it was not contested can still be reopened when the Secretary supports the motion and reopening is what allows the parties to settle.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
KINGWOOD
MINING COMPANY, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. WEVA 2009-857
A.C.
No. 46-08751-152739
Docket
No. WEVA 2009-1131
A.C.
No. 46-08751-159510
BEFORE: Jordan,
Chairman; Young, Cohen, and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On September 26, 2014, the Commission received from Kingwood Mining Company, LLC (“Kingwood”) a motion seeking to reopen two penalty assessments that had become final orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a). Subsequently, the Secretary requested that the Commission grant the operator’s motion to reopen in order to facilitate settlement of the assessments.
Having reviewed movant’s motion to
reopen, we reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
Consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary
shall file petitions for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28. In order to effectuate the settlement identified as the basis of the unopposed motion to reopen, the parties should promptly file a motion to approve settlement after the Secretary files the petitions for assessment of penalty.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen Jr., Commissioner
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Robert
H. Beatty, Jr.
Lorna
M. Waddell
Dinsmore
& Shohl LLP
215
Don Knotts Blvd., Suite 310
Morgantown,
West Virginia 26501
W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace