Secretary of Labor v. Rockhouse Creek Development LLC (Commission decision, February 18, 2010)

Plain-English summary

Rockhouse Creek intended to contest a proposed penalty assessment and timely sent it to counsel. Counsel's firm failed to calendar the matter, so no contest reached the Secretary and the assessment became a final Commission order. The operator moved promptly after discovering the mistake, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening, although she urged both the company and counsel to improve their contest system. The Commission reopened the assessment, remanded it for further proceedings, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
• Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded for a penalty proceeding.
• Key point: A promptly corrected attorney calendaring error can support reopening, but the operator and counsel remain responsible for creating a reliable contest process.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

February 18, 2010

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

ROCKHOUSE CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2009-516

A.C. No. 46-08778-160570

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 22, 2008, the Commission received from Rockhouse Creek Development LLC. (“Rockhouse”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

The operator states that it intended to contest the proposed penalty assessment and e-mailed it to counsel on a timely basis. However, the record indicates that, due to counsel’s error, the case was not properly calendared by counsel’s firm, and no contest was submitted. When the operator realized the mistake, it promptly sought re-opening. Although the Secretary does not oppose the reopening of the proposed penalty, she strongly urges both counsel and the operator to revise their present contest system so that it is more reliable.

Having reviewed Rockhouse’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interests of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

_____

Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner

_____

Michael G. Young, Commissioner 

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner   

Distribution:

Carol Ann Marunich, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP

215 Don Knotts Blvd., Suite 310

Morgantown, WV 26501

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. Of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021