Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Company
Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Company (FMSHRC WEVA 2008-1265): Flagrant designation removed in $70,000 settlement
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2014 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary and Wolf Run Mining proposed settling a civil penalty proceeding involving Order No. 6605922. Judge David F. Barbour approved the agreement, removed the order's flagrant designation, and reduced the penalty from $142,900 to $70,000. Wolf Run was ordered to pay within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: Settlement approved, flagrant designation removed, and penalty reduced to $70,000.
- Key point: The post-remand settlement resolved the case by removing the enhanced designation and cutting the proposed penalty by more than half.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE:
202-434-9958 / FAX: 202-434-9949
April 14, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Petitioner
v.
WOLF RUN MINING CO.,
Respondent
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEVA 2008-1265
A.C. No. 46-04168-151760
Mine: Sentinel
DECISION ON
REMAND APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO MODIFY
ORDER TO PAY
Before: Judge Barbour
This case is before me upon a petition for
assessment of a civil penalty filed under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(d). The Solicitor has filed a
motion to approve settlement. A reduction in the penalty from $142,900.00 to
$70,000.00 is proposed. The Solicitor also requests that Order No. 6605922 be
modified to remove the flagrant designation.
I have considered the representations and
documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered
settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the
Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of
settlement is GRANTED.
It is ORDERED that Order No. 6605922 be MODIFIED
to remove the flagrant designation.
It is further ORDERED that the operator
pay a penalty of $70,000.00 within thirty days of this order.[1]
/s/
David F. Barbour
David
F. Barbour
Administrative
Law Judge
Distribution:
Linda M. Henry, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, US DOL, The
Curtis Center, Suite 630E, 170 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA
19106-3306
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Three Gateway
Center, Suite 1500, 401 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
/DM
[1] Payment should be sent to: MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PAYMENT OFFICE, P. O. BOX 790390, ST.
LOUIS, MO 63179-0390
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2014, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.