Elk Run Coal Company, Inc. (Commission decision, April 28, 2011)

Elk Run Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2008-1101): Default vacated after timely answer went unfiled

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEVA 2008-1101
Decided
April 28, 2011
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-04

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2011
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A judge defaulted Elk Run Coal Company after the Commission did not receive an answer to the Secretary's penalty petition. Elk Run showed that its counsel had timely served the answer on the Secretary, after which the parties began discovery and settlement discussions, but the answer was never received by the Commission. The company's president later misunderstood the default order and did not send it to counsel, who acted promptly after learning of the default through a delinquency notice. Because the answer had been timely served and the Secretary did not oppose relief, the Commission reopened the proceeding, vacated the default, and remanded the case.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)
  • Outcome: The default order was vacated, and the penalty proceeding was reopened and remanded.
  • Key point: A final default may be reopened when the operator timely served its answer, continued litigating the case, and promptly sought relief after learning of the filing failure.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

April 28, 2011

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

ELK RUN COAL COMPANY, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2008-1101

A.C. No. 46-08553-147762

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On November 4, 2009, Chief Judge Lesnick issued to Elk Run Coal Company, Inc. (“Elk Run”), an Order to Show Cause for not answering the Secretary’s June 30, 2008 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty and ordered it to file its answer within 30 days of his order. On August 13, 2010, Judge Lesnick issued an Order of Default to Elk Run for failing to comply with his show cause order.

On November 10, 2010, the Commission received a motion by counsel to reopen the penalty assessment proceeding and relieve Elk Run from the order of default entered against it. The operator states that on December 2, 2009, via counsel, in response to the Order to Show Cause, it filed its answer to the Secretary’s Petition contesting 11 citations. Elk Run’s Answer was received by the assigned Solicitor but not by the Commission. The parties immediately began discovery and settlement negotiations. Elk Run explains that the default order was mailed to Elk Run’s president, Craig Boggs. The operator states that although Boggs received the order, not understanding what it meant and knowing that settlement negotiations were ongoing, he assumed it was a courtesy copy and did not forward it to counsel. Counsel learned of the default order on November 2, 2010, after receiving the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s (MSHA) delinquency letter from Elk Run. It immediately contacted the Commission to investigate, and subsequently filed its motion to reopen on November 9, 2010. Elk Run indicates in its motion that the Secretary does not oppose its request to reopen.

The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when his decision was issued on August 13, 2010. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). The judge’s order became a final decision of the Commission on September 22, 2010.

In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Upon review of the record, it appears that Elk Run timely filed its answer to the Secretary’s Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty in response to the Chief Judge’s Order to Show Cause. The Answer contains a certificate of service certifying that it was served by counsel on the representative for the Secretary on December 2, 2009, within 30 days of the show cause order. Additionally, the Secretary has not opposed the motion.

In the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Order of Default. This case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.


Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman


Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner


Michael G. Young, Commissioner


Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner


Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Max L. Corley, III, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP

P. O. Box 11887

900 Lee Street, Suite 600

Charleston, WV 25339

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. Of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace