Secretary of Labor v. Alex Energy, Inc. (ALJ decision, March 17, 2010)

Secretary of Labor v. Alex Energy, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2007-742, et al.): Hearing kept despite settlement in principle

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEVA 2007-742, WEVA 2007-743, WEVA 2007-821
Decided
March 17, 2010
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2010 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Interlocutory ALJ notice, not Commission precedent
This notice set the hearing location and settlement deadlines while the civil penalty proceedings continued. It did not dispose of the cases or become a final decision under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Three Alex Energy penalty proceedings were scheduled for an April 7, 2010 hearing. The parties reported a settlement in principle for one docket after months of negotiations, but no settlement-approval motion had been filed in any case. Judge Jerold Feldman kept the hearing on schedule and stated that no continuance request would be favorably considered. Written settlement motions were due by March 31, and any later agreement had to be presented on the hearing record. Failure to appear would result in dismissal or default judgment.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): No Mine Act or regulatory provision governs the substance of this scheduling notice.
  • Outcome: The April 7 hearing remained scheduled, with a March 31 deadline for written settlement motions.
  • Key point: A settlement in principle does not remove a case from the hearing calendar until the parties submit an agreement for approval.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FMSRHC ALJ DECISION

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001

March 17, 2010

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

ALEX ENERGY, INC.,

Respondent

:

:

:

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS

Docket No. WEVA 2007-742

A.C. No. 46-07165-122306-01

Docket No. WEVA 2007-743

A.C. No. 46-07165-122306-02

North Surface Mine

Docket No. WEVA 2007-821

A.C. No. 46-08838-124903

Superior Surface Mine

NOTICE OF HEARING SITE

The captioned civil penalty proceedings are scheduled for hearing on April 7, 2010. The initial Prehearing Order in these matters, issued on July 14, 2009, required the parties to engage in, and complete, settlement negotiations by September 25, 2009. As the September 25, 2009, settlement deadline approached, the parties made repeated representations that they were continuing to negotiate with the anticipation of reaching an agreement. Today,

on March 17, 2010, the respondent’s counsel advised my office, via email, that the parties “reached a settlement agreement in principle” with respect the citations contained in Docket No. WEVA 2007-742. However, to date, no motions for the approval of settlement have been filed in any of the captioned proceedings.

In view of the above, given the Commission’s unprecedented workload, the hearing in these matters will proceed as scheduled at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, April 7, 2010, at Commission headquarters. No requests for continuance will be favorably entertained. Any motions for the approval of settlement of these matters must be received in my office on or before March 31, 2010, by facsimile or regular mail. Any settlement agreement after March 31, 2010, must be presented by the parties for my approval on the record at the scheduled hearing. The failure of either party to appear at the hearing will result in the entry of a dismissal order or default judgment.

The hearing location is:

The Richard V. Beckley Hearing Room

Suite 9500 - Ninth Floor

601 New Jersey Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Any person who plans to attend this hearing and requires special accessibility features and/or any auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must request them in advance (subject to the limitations set forth in § 2706.160(d)).

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge 

Distribution: (Facsimile and Certified Mail)

Richard D. Hosch, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA,

100 Bluestone Road, Mt. Hope, WV 25880

Max L. Corley, III, Esq., Curtis Capehart, Esq., Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, P.O. Box 11887,

900 Lee Street, Suite 600, Charleston, WV 25339

/rps

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace