Wolf Run Mining Company (ALJ decision, May 19, 2011)
Wolf Run Mining Company (FMSHRC WEVA 2007-600-A): Sago seal citation settled for $8,500
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2011 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA alleged that Wolf Run failed to follow its ventilation plan when constructing seals later destroyed in the January 2006 Sago Mine explosion. Post-accident testing showed that both the installed seals and seals built exactly to the plan likely would have withstood the 20-psi force required at the time, but not the explosion's force of at least 90 psi. The Secretary therefore agreed to remove the unwarrantable-failure allegation, reduce negligence from high to moderate, and change the section 104(d)(1) order to a section 104(a) citation. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the settlement. Wolf Run was ordered to pay $8,500 instead of the proposed $9,700.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.335 and 75.370(a)(1)
- Outcome: The order was modified to a section 104(a) citation, the unwarrantable-failure allegation was withdrawn, and an $8,500 settlement was approved.
- Key point: Testing showed that compliance with the seal-construction plan would not have prevented failure under the much greater explosive force measured in the accident.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FMSRHC ALJ DECISION
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001
May 19, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Petitioner
v.
WOLF RUN MINING COMPANY,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEVA 2007-600-A
A.C. No. 46-08791-120481-02
Sago Mine
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Feldman
This matter concerns 104(d)(1) Order No. 7100904 that cites a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.370(a)(1) as a result of Wolf Run Mining Company’s (“Wolf Run’s”) alleged unwarrantable failure
to comply with an addendum to its approved ventilation plan. The cited
violation concerns the construction of ten Omega Block seals that were installed to seal an abandoned area in the 2nd Left Mains. The seals were destroyed as a consequence of the fatal explosion that occurred at the Sago Mine on January 2, 2006.
At the time of the explosion, 30 C.F.R. § 75.335 required seals to withstand an explosive force of at least 20 pounds per square inch (“psi”). The accident investigators determined that the seals in the Sago Mine were exposed to explosive forces in excess of 90 psi. Prior to this accident, Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) investigators had never encountered this level of explosive forces that had originated in abandoned areas behind seals.
Following this accident, MSHA conducted extensive seal strength tests with the participation of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the State of West Virginia. Omega Blocks that simulated the construction of the seals that were destroyed by the Sago Mine explosion, as well as seals constructed in accordance with the ventilation plan, were exposed to explosive forces. It was determined that both types of seals would likely have withstood explosive forces of 20 psi, although both would likely have failed to withstand the force of at least 90 psi created by the Sago explosion.
Consequently, MSHA determined that Wolf Run’s strict compliance with the seal installation requirements in the ventilation plan would not have prevented the fatal mine explosion. Therefore, the Secretary has agreed to withdraw the unwarrantable failure allegation, thus reducing the negligence attributable to Wolf Run from high to moderate, as the subject seals apparently satisfied the 20 psi strength requirements in effect at the time of the accident. Section 75.335 has since been modified to require seals constructed after October 20, 2008, to withstand forces of at least 50 psi, or 120 psi, depending on the type of atmospheric monitoring of the sealed areas.
The Secretary initially proposed a penalty of $9,700.00 for 104(d)(1) Order No. 7100904. The Secretary now has filed a motion to approve settlement wherein Wolf Run has agreed to pay a reduced civil penalty of $8,500.00. The settlement terms include modifying 104(d)(1) Order No. 7100904 to a 104(a) citation to reflect that the cited violation was not attributable to an unwarrantable failure.
I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this matter and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act. WHEREFORE, the motion to approve settlement IS GRANTED, and pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Wolf Run Mining Company IS ORDERED to pay a civil penalty of $8,500.00 within 30 days of this Order in satisfaction of 104(a) Citation No. 7100904.
Upon receipt of timely payment, the captioned civil penalty case IS DISMISSED.
Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution: (Regular and Certified Mail)
Robert S. Wilson, Esq, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1100 Wilson Blvd.,
22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209
R. Henry Moore, Esq, Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Three Gateway Center, 401 Liberty Avenue,
Suite 1340, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
/jel
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace