Secretary of Labor v. Aracoma Coal Company, Inc. (Commission decision, December 16, 2010)

Secretary of Labor v. Aracoma Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2006-654, et al.): Settlement order corrected and remanded

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
WEVA 2006-654, et al.
Decided
December 16, 2010
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission directed corrections to the docket list, citation count, and proposed assessment figures in an approved settlement order, and remanded to the Chief Judge to make those corrections. This is a final Commission order on the requested corrections. Any judicial review would be governed by 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

After the Commission affirmed Aracoma Coal's settlement, the parties asked it to correct clerical errors in the underlying ALJ order and attached docket lists. The Commission granted reconsideration, changed the count from 1,302 to 1,281 citations and orders, and corrected the total proposed assessment from $2,806,027 to $2,803,293. It also removed two dockets and 21 citations, added two dockets, and reassigned numerous citation numbers to their correct penalty dockets. The matter was remanded to the Chief Judge to make those corrections.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing rules: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(c) and 2700.78(a)
  • Outcome: Reconsideration was granted and the matter was remanded for correction of docket, citation, and assessment figures in the settlement order.
  • Key point: The Commission directed the Chief Judge to correct the docket list, citation count, and proposed assessment figures identified in the parties' motion.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

December 16, 2010

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

ARACOMA COAL COMPANY, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEVA 2006-654, et al.

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen Commissioners

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BY THE COMMISSION:

These matters arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006). On December 18, 2008, the parties filed with the Chief Judge a joint motion to approve settlement of 102 penalty dockets consisting of 1,302 separate citations and orders, covering two mines. The joint motion enumerated the 102 penalty dockets and 1,302 citations and orders in Addendum 1 and Addendum 2 attached to the motion. Chief Judge Robert Lesnick issued a Decision Approving Settlement/Order to Pay on December 23, 2008. 30 FMSHRC 1160 (Dec. 2008) (ALJ). On January 22, 2009, the Commission on its own motion, directed review of the judge’s decision approving the settlement.

On January 23, 2009, the parties filed with the judge a Joint Motion to Correct Settlement Order. The motion explained that the enumeration of the penalty dockets and of the citations and orders in Addendum 1 and Addendum 2 of the settlement motion had contained inaccuracies. Specifically, it had inadvertently contained 21 citations which were not part of the settlement, and contained a number of errors in associating citations and orders with the correct penalty docket. In their joint brief filed with the Commission, the parties noted the motion to the judge and pointed out that pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 69(c), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(c), the judge did not have authority to correct the clerical errors without leave of the Commission. Jt. Br. at 1 n.1.

On November 17, 2010, the Commission issued a decision affirming the judge’s approval of the settlement. 32 FMSHRC ___, Nos. WEVA 2006-654, et. al. (Nov. 17, 2010). On November 24, 2010, the Secretary filed a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 78(a), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.78(a), on behalf of the parties, which asked the Commission to reconsider its decision of November 17, 2010, so as to address the Joint Motion to Correct Settlement Order previously filed with the Chief Judge.

The parties’ joint motion to correct the Chief Judge’s Decision Approving Settlement/Order to Pay is granted, and pursuant to the January 23, 2009 letter from the Solicitor of Labor to Judge Lesnick, the Judge’s December 23, 2008 Decision shall be corrected as follows:

1. In the caption of the Decision, Docket Nos. WEVA 2007-444 and WEVA 2007-525 shall be deleted;

2. Docket Nos. WEVA 2006-659 and WEVA 2006-661 shall be added to the caption on the first cover page of the Decision;

3. In the first paragraph of the Decision, the reference to “1,302 citations and orders” shall be changed to “1,281 citations and orders;”

4. In both the first paragraph of the Decision and in footnote 1 on page 1 of the Decision, the amount of the total assessment shall be changed from “$2,806,027 to $2,803,293;”

5. In relation to Addenda 1 and 2 of the parties’ Motion to Approve Settlement, incorporated by reference into the court’s December 23, 2008 Decision Approving Settlement/Order to Pay:

(a) the 20 citations set forth within Docket No. WEVA 2007-444 on pages 9 and 10 of Addendum 1 (relating to the Aracoma Alma Mine #1) shall be deleted, and

(b) the one citation set forth within Docket No. WEVA 2007-525 on page 3 of Addendum 2 (relating to the Hernshaw Mine) shall be deleted;

6. That the following 19 citation numbers previously associated with Docket No. WEVA 2006-660 – set forth on page 3 of Addendum 1 (relating to the Aracoma Alma Mine #1) – shall be associated with Penalty Docket No. WEVA 2006-659:

7241394, 7241396, 7244374, 7244375, 7244376, 7244377,
7244378, 7244379, 7244380, 7244381, 7249273, 7250537,
7250538, 7252615, 7252805, 7252808, 7252810, 7252811,
7252812;

7. That the following 20 citation numbers – set forth on pages 23 and 24 of Addendum 1 (relating to the Aracoma Alma Mine #1) – shall be associated with Penalty Docket No. WEVA 2006-660:

7241398, 7241399, 7241400, 7244382, 7244383, 7244384,
7244386, 7252618, 7252619, 7252630, 7252640, 7252834,
7252838, 7252844, 7252845, 7252850, 7252855, 7252857,
7252858, 7252859;

8. That the following two citation numbers – set forth on page 24 of Addendum 1 (relating to the Aracoma Alma Mine #1) – shall be associated with Penalty Docket No. WEVA 2006-661:

7252866, 7253425;

9. That the following six citation and order numbers – set forth on pages 23 and 24 of Addendum 1 (relating to the Aracoma Alma Mine #1) – shall be associated with Penalty Docket No. WEVA 2008-1577:

6612795, 7182014, 7265918, 7265920, 7273497, 7280540;

10. That the following 30 citation numbers – set forth on pages 5 and 6 of Addendum 2 (relating to the Hernshaw Mine) – shall be associated with Penalty Docket No. 2008-1567:

6616651, 6616652, 6616653, 6616654, 6616655, 6616658,

6616659, 6616660, 6616663, 6616670, 6616672, 6616673,

6616679, 6616680, 6616681, 6616682, 6616717, 7279591,

7279594, 7279595, 7279596, 7279599, 7279606, 7279607,

7279608, 7279609, 7279610, 7279612, 7279615, 7279618.

Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Chief Judge to correct the settlement order as indicated above to conform to the corrections submitted by the parties.

______

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

______

Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner

______

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

______

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace