Speed Mining, Inc.
Speed Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 2004-187-R): Review petition withdrawn
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2005, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Speed Mining had asked the Commission to review an ALJ determination involving alleged violations of a modification issued by MSHA. While the Commission held the decision in abeyance so the parties could discuss settlement, Speed Mining moved to withdraw its review petition. The Commission granted the withdrawal, with the Secretary's support.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.10 and 2700.11
- Outcome: The petition for discretionary review was withdrawn by permission of the Commission.
- Key point: The Commission granted the operator's supported request to withdraw its pending review petition.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 New Jersey Avenue, NW,
Suite 9500
Washington, DC 20001
March 22, 2005
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket Nos. WEVA 2004-187-R
: WEVA 2004-188-R
v. : WEVA 2004-195-R
:
SPEED MINING, INC. :
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, and Young, Commissioners 1
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
In these consolidated contest proceedings arising under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (2000), the Commission had granted the petition for
review filed by Speed Mining, Inc. ("SMI") of an administrative law judge's determination that
SMI had in two instances violated terms of a modification previously issued by the Department
of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration to SMI. See 26 FMSHRC 708, 710-13 (Aug.
2004) (ALJ). On February 3, 2005, in response to a joint motion filed by the Secretary of Labor
and SMI requesting that the Commission hold the issuance of a decision in abeyance while the
parties discuss settlement in this and related cases, the Commission agreed to do so until March
21, 2005.
SMI has now moved, pursuant to Commission Procedural Rules 10 and 11, 29 C.F.R.
2700.10 and 2700.11, to withdraw its petition, and states in its motion that the Secretary of
Labor supports the motion. Having considered the motion, we grant permission to withdraw the
petition.
Footnote:
1 Commissioner Suboleski recused himself in this matter and took no part in its consideration. Pursuant to section 113(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 823(c), this panel of three Commissioners has been delegated to exercise the powers of the Commission.
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Distribution:
Timothy M. Biddle, Esq.
Daniel W. Wolff, Esq.
Crowell & Moring LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Jack Powasnik, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor West
Arlington, VA 22209-2247
Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2005. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.