Lakeview Rock Products (ALJ decision, August 13, 1998)

Lakeview Rock Products (FMSHRC WEST 98-6-DM): Discrimination settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 98-6-DM
Decided
August 13, 1998
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-12

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1998 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Jeffery S. Sill alleged that Lakeview Rock Products unlawfully terminated him from his loader-operator job at a rock-products mine. He found another loader-operator position after three weeks, later experienced a seasonal layoff, and then returned to work for another employer. After a hearing, the parties agreed to settle without the company admitting a violation. The company agreed to pay Sill $1,000 for any losses, pay MSHA a $1,500 civil penalty, and avoid a related individual-liability action. Judge August F. Cetti approved the settlement and ordered payment within 30 days, after which the case would be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, with $1,000 payable to Sill and a $1,500 civil penalty payable to the Secretary.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved a discrimination settlement after reviewing the hearing evidence and finding it consistent with the statutory penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
303-844-3993/FAX 303-844-5268

August 13, 1998

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 98-6-DM
on behalf of JEFFERY S. SILL,
:
Complainant
:
:
v. :
: Lakeview Rock Products
LAKEVIEW ROCK PRODUCTS, : Mine ID 42-01975
Respondent
:

DECISION

Appearance: Edward Falkowski, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Complainant;
Gregory M. Simonsen, Esq., Kirton & McConkie, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Cetti

This proceeding concerns a complaint of alleged discrimination filed by the Secretary of Labor against the Respondent pursuant to section 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. ' 815(c)(2) (the AAct@). The complaint was filed on behalf of Jeffery S. Sill, a former employee of the Respondent who claimed that his employment was illegally terminated on March 26, 1997. The Respondent denied any discrimination and it contended that Mr. Sill quit his employment with Respondent.

Mr. Sill was employed by Respondent as a loader operator. Three weeks after his alleged unlawful termination on March 26, 1997, Mr. Sill returned to work as a loader operator with another employer. Thus, at the time the original complaint was filed on October 6, 1997, Mr. Sill was still fully employed as loader operator and claimed only for the three weeks of back-pay that it took him to find the new job in April 1997.

In early December 1997, however, Mr. Sill was laid off from his new employment due to the slack winter season. He remained unemployed for a period of time and then returned to work


Page 2

for yet another employer as a loader operator. He is still continuing with that employment at the present time.

When the parties were unable to resolve their differences, the case was set for hearing.
The hearing included the direct and cross-examination of the Complainant. At the end of the hearing, the parties in open court agreed to settle the case. Under the terms of the agreement that the parties entered into the record, Respondent without admitting a violation of section 105(c) of the Act agreed to pay $1,000.00 to Complainant to cover any losses he may have and pay a civil penalty of $1,500.00 to MSHA. The parties also agreed as a part of the settlement that there will be no 110(c) action against any agent of the Respondent based upon any allegation of unlawful discrimination against Jeffery S. Sill under section 105(c) of the Act.

Based upon the exhibits and the testimony given at the hearing, I approve the settlement entered into the record at the hearing. I find it is consistent with the statutory criteria set forth in ' 110(i) of the Act.

ORDER

Respondent, if it has not previously done so, is ORDERED TO PAY within the next 30 days, $1,000.00 to Jeffery S. Sill and a civil penalty of $1,500.00 to the Secretary of Labor. Upon receipt of timely payment, this case is dismissed.

August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Edward Falkowski, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1999 Broadway, Suite 1600, Denver, CO 80202-5716 (Certified Mail)

Gregory M. Simonsen, Esq., KIRTON & McCONKIE, 1800 Eagle Gate Tower, 60 East South Temple, P.O. Box 45120, Salt Lake City, UT 84145-0120 (Certified Mail)

/sh

-2-

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace