FMSHRC Commission decision Docket WEST 96-120-M Decided March 14, 1996 Procedural

W.A. Morris Sand and Gravel, Inc.

W.A. Morris Sand and Gravel, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 96-120-M): Jurisdiction issue accepted for review, stay denied

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1996, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1996
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

W.A. Morris Sand and Gravel petitioned for review of an ALJ’s orders granting temporary reinstatement and denying motions to dismiss in a discrimination case brought on behalf of Ramon S. Franco. Morris asked the Commission to stay the temporary reinstatement order. The Commission granted review on the jurisdictional question of whether Franco was a miner, denied review on the other issues, and denied the stay because Morris did not show compelling or extraordinary circumstances.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)
  • Outcome: Review was granted only on whether the complainant was a miner. Review was otherwise denied, and the stay request was denied.
  • Key point: A stay of temporary reinstatement requires a showing of compelling or extraordinary circumstances.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

                                    March 14, 1996

SECRETARY OF LABOR, on behalf :
RAMON S. FRANCO :
Complainant :
:
v. : Docket No. WEST 96-120-M
:
W.A. MORRIS SAND AND :
GRAVEL, INC., :
Respondent :

                           DIRECTION FOR REVIEW
                           DENIAL OF REVIEW AND
               DENIAL OF STAY OF TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT

    On February 26, 1996, respondent W.A. Morris Sand and Gravel (“Morris”) filed a

petition for discretionary review of the February 15, 1996, orders of Administrative Law Judge
Richard W. Manning granting the Secretary’s application for temporary reinstatement and
denying Morris’ motions to dismiss. Morris also has requested a stay of the temporary
reinstatement order.

   Upon consideration of Morris’ petition and request, the Secretary’s response in opposition

and respondent’s reply, the petition for review is granted as to the issue of jurisdiction, i.e.
whether the complainant is a miner. In all other respects the petition is denied.


Page 2

   Respondent’s request for a stay of the temporary reinstatement order fails to demonstrate

compelling or extraordinary circumstances, and is therefore denied. See Perry Transport, Inc., 15
FMSHRC 196, 198 (February 1993).

                                                ___________________________
                                                Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman



                                                ____________________________
                                                Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner



                                                ____________________________
                                                Arlene Holen, Commissioner



                                                ______________________________
                                                Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner



                                                ______________________________
                                                James C. Riley, Commissioner

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1996. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.