DCL Construction, Inc. (ALJ decision, April 14, 1996)

DCL Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 95-248-M): Settlement approved with penalty reduction

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 95-248-M
Decided
April 14, 1996
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1996
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

DCL Construction faced one section 104(d)(1) citation and seven section 104(d)(1) orders. The parties asked the judge to approve a settlement reducing the proposed penalty from $6,700 to $4,690. The motion stated that the original penalty had been specially assessed and that DCL had no violations during the prior 24 months. Judge Richard W. Manning found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and ordered DCL to pay $4,690 within 90 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provision(s): 30 C.F.R. § 100.5; 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: Settlement approved and amended penalty of $4,690 ordered paid within 90 days.
  • Key point: The judge approved a documented settlement that reduced the proposed penalty by $2,010.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
303-844-3577/FAX 303-844-5268
April 14, 1996

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 95-248-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 04-05257-05502 :
v. :
: Portable Crusher
DCL CONSTRUCTION, INC., :
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Manning

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of a civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. ' 801 et seq. (the "Act"). Peti- tioner filed a motion to approve settlement and order payment of an amended penalty. A reduction in penalty from $6,700.00 to $4,690.00 for one section 104(d)(1) citation and seven section 104(d)(1) orders is proposed. The motion states that the orig- inal proposed penalty was specially assessed under 30 C.F.R. ' 100.5 and that Respondent has a history of no violations during the previous 24 months.

I have considered the representations and documentation sub- mitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

Accordingly, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and Respondent is ORDERED TO PAY the Secretary of Labor the sum of $4,690.00 within 90 days of the date of this decision.

Richard W. Manning
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

J. Mark Ogden, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 300 N. Los Angeles St., #3247, Los Angeles, CA 90012-3381


Page 2

DCL CONSTRUCTION, INC., P.O. Box 1762, Salton City, CA 92275

RWM

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace