Newmont Gold Company
Newmont Gold Company (FMSHRC WEST 95-228-DM): Discrimination penalty settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The judge had previously found that Newmont Gold Company's discharge of Lance A. Paul violated the Mine Act's discrimination provision. The Secretary proposed a $9,000 civil penalty, and Newmont did not contest it. The judge approved the settlement, conditioned dismissal on timely payment of the penalty and the stipulated relief to Paul, and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.44(b); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: A $9,000 civil penalty settlement was approved, with dismissal conditioned on timely payment.
- Key point: The discrimination case was resolved through payment of the proposed civil penalty and previously stipulated relief.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
May 15, 1996
LANCE A. PAUL, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant :
v. : Docket No. WEST 95-228-DM
: MSHA Case No. WE MD 95-04
NEWMONT GOLD COMPANY, :
Respondent : Gold Quarry
: Mine ID 26-00500
DECISION APPROVING PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY
Before: Judge Feldman
This matter is before me based upon a discrimination
complaint filed on March 1, 1995, pursuant to section 105(c)(3)
of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Mine Act),
30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3) by the complainant, Lance A. Paul, against
the respondent, Newmont Gold Company (Newmont). On February 22,
1996, a decision on liability was released wherein it was
determined that Newmont’s November 10, 1994 discharge of
Lance Paul was discriminatorily motivated and in violation of
section 105(c) of the Mine Act. 18 FMSHRC 181. A Supplemental
Decision approving the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Settlement
awarding Lance Paul economic reinstatement in lieu of
reemployment was issued on April 11, 1996. 18 FMSHRC .
The February 22, 1996 decision on liability, citing
Commission Rule 44(b), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.44(b), requested the
Secretary to consider filing with this Commission an appropriate
petition for the purpose of proposing a civil penalty for
Newmont Gold Company’s violation of section 105(c) of the
Mine Act.
On March 18, 1996, the Secretary filed a Petition for
Assessment of Civil Penalty proposing imposition of a civil
penalty of $9,000.00 in this matter. On May 7, 1996, Newmont,
through counsel, filed a response to the Secretary’s Petition
stating that, “in the interests of completing this matter without
further cost and expense of litigation, [it] does not contest the
proposed penalty assessment.” I construe the respondent’s
decision to pay the proposed civil penalty as a motion to approve
settlement.
ORDER
I have considered the record in this case, and I conclude
that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria
set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act. WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED
Page 2
that Newmont Gold Company tender payment of a civil penalty of
$9,000.00 to the Mine Safety and Health Administration in
satisfaction of the subject violation of section 105(c) of the
Mine Act. Payment shall be made within 30 days of this decision.
Upon timely receipt of this civil penalty, and Newmont’s timely
payment to Paul of the stipulated relief as specified in the
April 11, 1996, decision on damages, this case IS DISMISSED.
Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Lance A. Paul, P.O. Box 21115, Crescent Valley, NV 89821
(Certified Mail)
Lance A. Paul, c/o Operating Engineers Local 3, 1094 Lamoille
Highway, Elko, NV 89801 (Certified Mail)
Charles W. Newcom, Esq., Sherman & Howard L.L.C., First
Interstate Tower North, 633 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3000,
Denver, CO 80202 (Certified Mail)
Don R. Hullinger, Director, Human Resources, Newmont Gold
Company, P.O. Box 669, Carlin, Nevada (Certified Mail)
Mark R. Malecki, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington,
VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
/mca
2
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1996, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.