C.W. Mining Company
C.W. Mining Company (FMSHRC WEST 95-193): Respirable-dust citation vacated
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
C.W. Mining Company's Bear Canyon #1 Mine was cited after five operator dust samples averaged 1.9 milligrams of respirable dust per cubic meter. MSHA had assigned a 1.2-milligram limit to a replacement continuous miner, but that lower limit belonged to an older machine that had been scrapped. The replacement machine was subject to a 2.0-milligram limit, so the cited average was within the correct standard. Judge August F. Cetti vacated the citation and dismissed the docket.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 70.100(a)
- Outcome: Citation No. 9997061 was vacated, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: A citation based on an incorrectly assigned respirable-dust limit cannot stand when the measured concentration was within the correct limit for the equipment.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
303-844-3993/FAX 303-844-5268
May 2, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 95-193
Petitioner : A.C. No. 42-01697-03675
:
v. :
: Bear Canyon #1
C.W. MINING COMPANY, :
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances: Robert Cohen, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia,
for Petitioner;
Carl E. Kingston, Esq., Salt Lake City, Utah,
for Respondent.
Before: Judge Cetti
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of
civil penalties under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. the \"Act.\" The
Secretary of Labor on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health Ad-
ministration, (MSHA), charges the Respondent, C.W. Mining Com-
pany, the operator of Bear Canyon #1 Mine, with the violation of
a respirable dust violation of the regulatory safety standard 30
C.F.R. § 70.100(a).
The single citation at issue describes the violation as
follows:
Based on the results of five valid dust sam-
ples collected by the operator, the average
concentration of respirable dust in the work-
ing environment of the designated occupation
code 036 in mechanized mining united 003-0
was 1.9 milligrams which exceeded the appli-
cable limit of 1.2 milligrams. Management
shall take corrective actions to lower the
respirable dust and then sample each produc-
tion shift until five valid samples are taken
and submitted to the Pittsburgh Respirable
Dust Processing Laboratory. Approved respir-
atory equipment shall be made available to
all persons working the area.
At the hearing, counsel for the Secretary stated that an
older continuous miner, MMU 003-0, was operating under a reduced
respirable dust level of 1.2 milligrams of respirable dust per
cubic meters of air. The operator placed this older machine in a
non-producing status and it was later scrapped. A new continuous
miner was purchased and the new machine was also designated as
MMU 003-3. MSHA inadvertently assigned the reduced standard of
the old machine, MMU 003-0, to the new machine. The new machine
should have been operating on a 2.0 milligrams or respirable
level per cubic meters of air and not on the old reduced standard
of 1.2 milligrams applicable to the old machine. When the oper-
ator sent in his samples on the new mechanized unit 003-3, the
average concentration of respirable dust was 1.9 milligrams which
was above the 1.2 milligrams standard which had erroneously been
assigned to the new machine but within the correct 2.0 milligrams
standard.
Thus, it was clear that the citation was issued in error.
Consequently Citation No. 9997061 is vacated.
ORDER
Citation No. 9997061 is VACATED and this case, Docket No.
WEST 95-193 is DISMISSED.
August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Robert Cohen, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203
(Certified Mail)
Carl E. Kingston, Esq., C.W. MINING COMPANY, 3212 South State
Street, P.O. Box 15809, Salt Lake City, UT 84115
2
(Certified Mail)
/sh
3
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1996, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.