Condero Mining Company (ALJ decision, March 27, 1995)

Condero Mining Company (FMSHRC WEST 95-151-D): Temporary reinstatement approved and proceeding dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 95-151-D
Decided
March 27, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor filed an application for temporary reinstatement on behalf of Keith D. James after Cordero Mining Company terminated his employment. The parties agreed to a voluntary economic temporary reinstatement while a related discrimination case proceeded. Judge August F. Cetti approved that agreement. Because no further issues remained in the temporary reinstatement docket, the proceeding was dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.45
  • Outcome: The voluntary temporary reinstatement agreement was approved, and the temporary reinstatement proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: An agreed economic temporary reinstatement resolved the temporary reinstatement proceeding while the related merits case continued.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


[DOCID: f:w-95-151.wais]

CORDERO MINING COMPANY
March 27, 1995
WEST 95-151-D

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-3993/FAX (303) 844-5268

March 27, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), :
on behalf of KEITH D. JAMES, : Docket No. WEST 95-151-D Applicant :
:
v. :
:
CORDERO MINING COMPANY, : Cordero Mine 48-00992 Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT and
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Applicant; Charles W. Newcom, Esq., Sherman & Howard, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Cetti

I

This Discrimination Proceeding concerns an Application for Temporary Reinstatement. It was filed on January 20, 1995, by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Keith D. James. The action was brought pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq., Supp. 1, 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2) and Commission Rule 45, 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.45.

Within 10 days following receipt of the Secretary's application to temporary reinstatement Respondent objected to the application and requested a hearing.

The parties declined an immediate hearing, requesting instead that the matter be heard on March 22-24, 1995, in Gillette, Wyoming at the same time as the regular discrimination hearing on the merits for permanent reinstatement and other remedies as set forth by the Secretary in Docket No. WEST 95-226-D.

II

Undisputed Facts

1. Respondent Cordero Mining Co. supervises, operates, and controls mining activities at the Cordero Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 49-00992) located in Campbell County, Wyoming, and is therefore an "operator" as defined by Section 3(d) of the Act.

2. The products of the Cordero Mine enter and affect interstate commerce.

3. At all times relevant to this proceeding Keith D.
James was employed by Respondent as an equipment operator and therefore was a "miner" as defined in Section 3(g) of the Act.

4. On or about October 6, 1994, Respondent terminated the employment of Keith D. James

5. Respondent is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. ("the Act").

6. The presiding Administrative Law Judge has jurisdiction in this matter.

III

The hearing was held in Gillette, Wyoming on March 22 and 23 of 1995. At the hearing the parties advised the Judge on the record that the parties had mutually agreed to a voluntary economic temporary reinstatement beginning February 27, 1995 and continuing thereafter pending the decision in Docket No. WEST 95-226-D which the parties are now briefing. The parties requested the Judge's approval of their voluntary agreement. On review of the present record I approved the voluntary temporary reinstatement agreement. There being no further issues in Docket No. WEST 95-151-D said proceeding for temporary reinstatement is DISMISSED.

August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1999 Broadway, Suite 1600, Denver, CO 80202-5716 (Certified Mail)

Charles W. Newcom, Esq., SHERMAN & HOWARD, 633 17th Street, Suite 3000, Denver, CO 80202 (Certified Mail)

/sh

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace