T.E. Bertagnolli & Associates
T.E. Bertagnolli & Associates (FMSHRC WEST 94-226-M): Settlement approved and hearing canceled
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
T.E. Bertagnolli & Associates and the Secretary submitted a settlement covering two consolidated civil-penalty proceedings. Judge August F. Cetti approved reduced penalties totaling $9,000 and vacated one penalty tied to Citation No. 4139747. The order dismissed the cases after payment and canceled the scheduled hearing.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 56.11001, 30 C.F.R. § 56.14109(a), 30 C.F.R. § 56.12016, 30 C.F.R. § 56.15002
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, one citation and penalty were vacated, and $9,000 in reduced penalties was ordered paid.
- Key point: The judge approved the parties' settlement and resolved the consolidated proceedings without a hearing.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
303-844-5266/FAX 303-844-5268
February 20, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 94-226-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 26-02007-05512
:
v. : Docket No. WEST 94-681-M
: A.C. No. 26-02007-05515
T.E. BERTAGNOLLI & ASSOCIATES, :
Respondent : Bertagnolli Aggregates
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER CANCELING HEARING
Before: Judge Cetti
The above-captioned cases are consolidated for evaluation
and disposition. Docket No. WEST 94-681-M was assigned to the
Judge on remand.
These consolidated cases are before me upon a petition for
assessment of civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has
filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss
these cases.
In Docket No. WEST 94-226-M, under the proffered settlement,
there is a reduction of the original proposed penalties as
follows:
Docket No. WEST 94-226-M
Alleged Safety Initial
Standard Violated Proposed Settlement
Citation No. (CFR Title 30) Penalty Disposition
4138636 56.11001 $3,500.00 $1,750.00
4139102 56.14109(a) $1,500.00 1,000.00
4139103 56.14109(a) $1,500.00 1,000.00
4139105 56.11001 $3,500.00 1,750.00
TOTAL $5,500.00
Page 2
In Docket No. WEST 94-681-M there is a reduction of original
penalties as follows:
Docket No. WEST 94-681-M
Alleged Safety Initial
Standard Violated Proposed Settlement
Citation No. (CFR Title 30) Penalty Disposition
4139741 56.12016 $5,200.00 $3,500.00
4139747 56.15002 $4,600.00 Vacate
TOTAL $3,500.00
I have considered the representations and documentation sub-
mitted in these cases and I conclude that the proffered settle-
ment is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section
110(i) of the Act.
ORDER
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED
and Citation No. 4139747 and its proposed civil penalty are
VACATED.
It is further ORDERED THAT THE OPERATOR PAY the approved
penalties totaling $9,000.00 to the Office of Assessments, Mine
Safety and Health Administration, P.O. Box 360250M, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15251 within 30 days of the date of this decision.
Upon such payment these cases are dismissed. In view of the
approved settlement, the hearing previously scheduled for
February 20, 1996, is CANCELED.
August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Susan Gillett-Kumli, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Depart-
ment of Labor, 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 1110, San Francisco, CA
94105-2999
2
Page 3
N. Childress, T.E. BERTAGNOLLI & ASSOCIATES, P.O. Box 2577,
Carson City, NV 89702
/sh
3
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1996, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.