John Heter, George Haluska, Gerald Moulin, and Eliezer Gonzales, employed by EIU of California (ALJ decision, October 17, 1994)

EIU of California employees (FMSHRC WEST 93-313-M, WEST 93-314-M, WEST 93-329-M, and WEST 93-458-M): Three cases dismissed and one penalty reduced

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEST 93-313-M, WEST 93-314-M, WEST 93-329-M, WEST 93-458-M
Decided
October 17, 1994
Presiding judge
Outcome
Mixed result
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor brought civil penalty proceedings against John Heter, George Haluska, Gerald Moulin, and Eliezer Gonzales under section 110(c) of the Mine Act. After a hearing began, the Secretary withdrew the penalty requests against Heter, Haluska, and Moulin, and those three cases were dismissed. The Secretary agreed to reduce Gonzales's proposed penalty to $1,000, payable in ten monthly installments, and Judge John J. Morris approved that arrangement. Gonzales's case would be dismissed after the settlement was paid in full.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 57.12002
  • Outcome: The cases against Heter, Haluska, and Moulin were dismissed. Gonzales's penalty was reduced to $1,000, payable in monthly installments, with dismissal after full payment.
  • Key point: A settlement may withdraw penalty claims against some respondents while reducing and scheduling payment for another respondent's penalty.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. J. HETER & G. HALUSKA & G. MOULIN & E. GONZALES DDATE: 19941017 TTEXT:


Page 2

~2126
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5267/FAX (303) 844-5268
October 17, 1994

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 93-313-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 04-05134-05505 ABXN :
v. : Docket No. WEST 93-314-M
: A.C. No. 04-05134-05506 ABXN
JOHN HETER, GEORGE HALUSKA, :
GERALD MOULIN, and
: Docket No. WEST 93-329-M
ELIEZER GONZALES, employed : A.C. No. 04-05134-05504 ABXN
by EIU OF CALIFORNIA
:
Respondents : Docket No. WEST 93-458-M : A.C. No. 04-05134-05502 ABXN
:
: Specialty Sand Plant

DECISION

Appearances: Edward H. Fitch, IV, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner;

John Heter, Saugus, California; George Haluska, Simi Valley, California; Gerald Moulin, Cyprus, California; Eliezer Gonzales, Bakersfield, California, all employees of EIU of California and all appearing pro se.

Before: Judge Morris

The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) charged Respondents Heter, Haluska, Moulin and Gonzales with violating Section 110(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (the "Act").

A hearing commenced in Simi Valley, California on August 30,
1994. After evidence was partially heard, the Secretary moved for the following disposition:

 1.   The Secretary moved to withdraw his request for civil

penalties against Respondents Heter and Haluska. (Tr. 120).

 2.   The Secretary has further concluded that there is in-

adequate evidence to establish that Respondent Moulin knowingly authorized, ordered or carried out a violation of 30 C.F.R.


Page 3

~2127
57.12002 and therefore, the Secretary withdraws the request fo a 110(c) civil penalty as to said Respondent. (Tr. 123).

3. After considering the testimony of Respondent Gonzales, the Secretary has agreed to reduce his proposed civil penalty to $1,000.00 payable in monthly installments of $100.00 per month with the first payment due October 20, 1994.

Respondent Gonzales accepted this arrangement. (Tr.
128).

4. The Secretary has concluded that there is adequate evidence to establish that as an independent contractor the OHM Corporation (Footnote 1) should be charged by MSHA with a 110(a) corporate violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.12002 based on the totality of the events which transpired. These events are the result of the joint effort between OHM Corporation personnel and CZS Corporation personnel relating to an incorrect electrical installation. (Tr. 123, 124).

5. It is further agreed that a civil penalty of $2,500.00 will be assessed in any corporate case brought by MSHA against OHM Corporation for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.12002. (Tr. 123-125).

6. Additional statements by the parties also involve OHM Corporation and CZS Corporation. Such statements are in the record of the proceedings.

I have reviewed the settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. The settlement was approved at the hearing and the approval is formalized in this decision.

Accordingly, I enter the following:

ORDER

1. In re: Secretary v. John Heter, WEST 93-313-M.

The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.

2. In re: Secretary v. George Haluska, WEST 93-314-M.

The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.

___
1
OHM Corporation is not a party in the captioned cases but it designed a 16 KV Electrical Power Distribution System for use in the Specialty Sand Plant operated by CZS Corporation (Joint Stipulation of Facts filed August 30, 1994).


Page 4

~2128
3. In re: Secretary v. Gerald Moulin, WEST 93-329-M.

The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.

4. In re: Secretary v. Eliezer Gonzales, WEST 93-458-M.

The Secretary's motion to reduce the proposed civil penalty to $1,000.00 is GRANTED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent Gonzales pay a penalty of $1,000.00 in accordance with the payment schedule set forth below:

DATE
PAYMENT

October 20, 1994
$100
November 20, 1994
$100
December 20, 1994
$100
January 20, 1995
$100
February 20, 1995
$100
March 20, 1995
$100
April 20, 1995
$100
May 20, 1995
$100
June 20, 1995
$100
July 20, 1995
$100

Payments shall be made by certified or cashier's check made payable to "The U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA," and mailed to Mine Safety and Health Administration, P.O. Box 360250M, Pitts- burgh, PA 15251-6250. Each payment instrument shall include the relevant docket number, WEST 93-458-M, and the Assessment Control Number, 04-05134-05502-ABXN. Compliance with this payout scheme requires Respondent to have his monthly payments deposited in the U.S. Mail by the dates above listed.

In the event of Respondent Gonzales' default on any of the above recited installments, the total amount of the proposed penalties as amended, less any monies paid before Respondent's default, shall become due and payable and interest shall be assessed against such remaining unpaid balance at a rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 1961 from the date of default until the total amount is paid in full. Furthermore, Respondent shall be liable for all court costs, attorney fees, and other expenses reasonably incurred by the U.S. Department of Labor in pursuing the recovery of the remaining unpaid balance plus any interest assessed thereon.


Page 5

~2129
Upon payment of the agreed settlement in full, Docket No. WEST 93-458-M is DISMISSED.

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Edward H. Fitch, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)

Mr. John C. Heter, 13910 Lang Station Road, Saugus, CA 91351 (Certified Mail)

Mr. George Haluska, 3018 San Angelo Avenue, Simi Valley, CA 93063 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Gerald Moulin, OHM Corporation, 5951 Lakeshore Drive, Cypress, CA 90630 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Eliezer Gonzales, 3712 Woodbine Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93307 P.O. Box 1912, Bakersfield, CA 93303 (Certified Mail)

E.I.U. OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Ms. Donna Moore, 6950 District Boulevard, P.O. Box 40878, Bakersfield, CA 93384 (Certified Mail)

sh

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace