John Heter, George Haluska, Gerald Moulin, and Eliezer Gonzales, employed by EIU of California
EIU of California employees (FMSHRC WEST 93-313-M, WEST 93-314-M, WEST 93-329-M, and WEST 93-458-M): Three cases dismissed and one penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor brought civil penalty proceedings against John Heter, George Haluska, Gerald Moulin, and Eliezer Gonzales under section 110(c) of the Mine Act. After a hearing began, the Secretary withdrew the penalty requests against Heter, Haluska, and Moulin, and those three cases were dismissed. The Secretary agreed to reduce Gonzales's proposed penalty to $1,000, payable in ten monthly installments, and Judge John J. Morris approved that arrangement. Gonzales's case would be dismissed after the settlement was paid in full.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 57.12002
- Outcome: The cases against Heter, Haluska, and Moulin were dismissed. Gonzales's penalty was reduced to $1,000, payable in monthly installments, with dismissal after full payment.
- Key point: A settlement may withdraw penalty claims against some respondents while reducing and scheduling payment for another respondent's penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. J. HETER & G. HALUSKA & G. MOULIN & E. GONZALES
DDATE:
19941017
TTEXT:
Page 2
~2126
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5267/FAX (303) 844-5268
October 17, 1994
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 93-313-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 04-05134-05505 ABXN
:
v. : Docket No. WEST 93-314-M
: A.C. No. 04-05134-05506 ABXN
JOHN HETER, GEORGE HALUSKA, :
GERALD MOULIN, and : Docket No. WEST 93-329-M
ELIEZER GONZALES, employed : A.C. No. 04-05134-05504 ABXN
by EIU OF CALIFORNIA :
Respondents : Docket No. WEST 93-458-M
: A.C. No. 04-05134-05502 ABXN
:
: Specialty Sand Plant
DECISION
Appearances: Edward H. Fitch, IV, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia,
for Petitioner;
John Heter, Saugus, California; George Haluska,
Simi Valley, California; Gerald Moulin, Cyprus,
California; Eliezer Gonzales, Bakersfield,
California, all employees of EIU of California and
all appearing pro se.
Before: Judge Morris
The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA) charged Respondents Heter, Haluska,
Moulin and Gonzales with violating Section 110(c) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (the
"Act").
A hearing commenced in Simi Valley, California on August 30,
-
After evidence was partially heard, the Secretary moved
for the following disposition:-
The Secretary moved to withdraw his request for civil
penalties against Respondents Heter and Haluska. (Tr. 120). -
The Secretary has further concluded that there is in-
adequate evidence to establish that Respondent Moulin knowingly
authorized, ordered or carried out a violation of 30 C.F.R.
-
Page 3
~2127
57.12002 and therefore, the Secretary withdraws the request fo
a 110(c) civil penalty as to said Respondent. (Tr. 123).
3. After considering the testimony of Respondent Gonzales,
the Secretary has agreed to reduce his proposed civil penalty to
$1,000.00 payable in monthly installments of $100.00 per month
with the first payment due October 20, 1994.
Respondent Gonzales accepted this arrangement. (Tr.
128).
4. The Secretary has concluded that there is adequate
evidence to establish that as an independent contractor the OHM
Corporation (Footnote 1) should be charged by MSHA with a 110(a)
corporate violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.12002 based on the totality
of the events which transpired. These events are the result of
the joint effort between OHM Corporation personnel and CZS
Corporation personnel relating to an incorrect electrical installation.
(Tr. 123, 124).
5. It is further agreed that a civil penalty of $2,500.00
will be assessed in any corporate case brought by MSHA against
OHM Corporation for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.12002. (Tr.
123-125).
6. Additional statements by the parties also involve OHM
Corporation and CZS Corporation. Such statements are in the
record of the proceedings.
I have reviewed the settlement and I find it is reasonable
and in the public interest. The settlement was approved at the
hearing and the approval is formalized in this decision.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
ORDER
1. In re: Secretary v. John Heter, WEST 93-313-M.
The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for
penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.
2. In re: Secretary v. George Haluska, WEST 93-314-M.
The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for
penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.
1
OHM Corporation is not a party in the captioned cases but it
designed a 16 KV Electrical Power Distribution System for use in
the Specialty Sand Plant operated by CZS Corporation (Joint
Stipulation of Facts filed August 30, 1994).
Page 4
~2128
3. In re: Secretary v. Gerald Moulin, WEST 93-329-M.
The Secretary's motion to withdraw his request for
penalties herein is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.
4. In re: Secretary v. Eliezer Gonzales, WEST 93-458-M.
The Secretary's motion to reduce the proposed civil
penalty to $1,000.00 is GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent Gonzales pay a
penalty of $1,000.00 in accordance with the payment schedule set
forth below:
DATE PAYMENT
October 20, 1994 $100
November 20, 1994 $100
December 20, 1994 $100
January 20, 1995 $100
February 20, 1995 $100
March 20, 1995 $100
April 20, 1995 $100
May 20, 1995 $100
June 20, 1995 $100
July 20, 1995 $100
Payments shall be made by certified or cashier's check made
payable to "The U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA," and mailed to
Mine Safety and Health Administration, P.O. Box 360250M, Pitts-
burgh, PA 15251-6250. Each payment instrument shall include the
relevant docket number, WEST 93-458-M, and the Assessment Control
Number, 04-05134-05502-ABXN. Compliance with this payout scheme
requires Respondent to have his monthly payments deposited in the
U.S. Mail by the dates above listed.
In the event of Respondent Gonzales' default on any of the
above recited installments, the total amount of the proposed
penalties as amended, less any monies paid before Respondent's
default, shall become due and payable and interest shall be
assessed against such remaining unpaid balance at a rate provided
by 28 U.S.C. 1961 from the date of default until the total amount
is paid in full. Furthermore, Respondent shall be liable for all
court costs, attorney fees, and other expenses reasonably incurred
by the U.S. Department of Labor in pursuing the recovery of the
remaining unpaid balance plus any interest assessed thereon.
Page 5
~2129
Upon payment of the agreed settlement in full, Docket No. WEST
93-458-M is DISMISSED.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Edward H. Fitch, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203
(Certified Mail)
Mr. John C. Heter, 13910 Lang Station Road, Saugus, CA 91351
(Certified Mail)
Mr. George Haluska, 3018 San Angelo Avenue, Simi Valley, CA 93063
(Certified Mail)
Mr. Gerald Moulin, OHM Corporation, 5951 Lakeshore Drive, Cypress,
CA 90630 (Certified Mail)
Mr. Eliezer Gonzales, 3712 Woodbine Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93307
P.O. Box 1912, Bakersfield, CA 93303 (Certified Mail)
E.I.U. OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Ms. Donna Moore, 6950 District
Boulevard, P.O. Box 40878, Bakersfield, CA 93384
(Certified Mail)
sh
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1994, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.