Western Sand & Gravel (ALJ decision, February 24, 1993)

Western Sand & Gravel (FMSHRC WEST 92-511-M): Settlement approved at $192

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 92-511-M
Decided
February 24, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Western Sand & Gravel operated the Tenino Pit and faced a proposed civil penalty of $431. The parties jointly asked the judge to approve a settlement reducing the penalty to $192. Judge Paul Merlin found the reduction appropriate in light of the operator's small size and negligible history. He approved the settlement and ordered payment within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 820(i).
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and a $192 penalty was ordered.
  • Key point: The judge accepted a substantial penalty reduction based on the operator's small size and negligible history.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. WEST 92-511-M
Petitioner : A. C. No. 45-03119-05508 :
v. :
:
:
WESTERN SAND & GRAVEL,
: Tenino Pit
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Merlin

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of a civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlement. A reduction in the penalty from $431 to $192 is proposed. The proposed reduction is large but the recommended amounts appear proper in light of the operator's small size and negligible history. Therefore, I conclude based on the representations and documentation submitted in this case that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the operator pay a penalty of $192 within 30 days of this order.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Cathy Barnes, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 945, Seattle, WA 98101

A. Don Scarsella, Western Sand & Gravel, P.O. Box 68388, Seattle, Washington 98188

rdj

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace