Asamera Minerals (US) Incorporated (ALJ decision, October 28, 1991)

Asamera Minerals (US) Incorporated (FMSHRC WEST 91-57-M): Settlement approved at $3,240

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 91-57-M
Decided
October 28, 1991
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-16

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1991
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision
This ruling became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because the Commission did not direct review. It is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Asamera Minerals operated the Gooseberry Mine, where a miner died in a fall while replacing damaged timber dividers in a manway. MSHA issued two citations alleging violations of standards concerning fall protection and underground mine openings, with proposed penalties totaling $6,000. After the hearing and before post-hearing briefing, the parties reached a settlement that reduced the total penalty to $3,240. Judge August F. Cetti approved the agreement as reasonable under the statutory penalty criteria and ordered payment within 30 days, after which the proceeding would be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 57.15005 and § 57.11012
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, reducing the proposed penalties from $6,000 to $3,240.
  • Key point: The judge approved the negotiated penalty after finding the agreement reasonable under the statutory criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. ASAMERA MINERALS (US)
DDATE:
19911028
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1725
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 91-57-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 26-00249-05511

v. Gooseberry Mine

ASAMERA MINERALS (US)
INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: George B. O'Haver, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner;
Charles R. Bush, Esq., Preston, Thorgrimson, Shidler, Gates & Ellis, Seattle, Washington, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Cetti

The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), charged Respondent with violating two safety regulations promulgated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq. (the "Act").

There was a fatal fall-of-person accident at the mine. The accident occurred while the miner was replacing damaged timber dividers in the manway for the 1000-7 stope on the 1000 level. The miner fell approximately 66 feet down a manway timber slide.

Following the accident investigation, MSHA issued two 104(a) citations to the Respondent alleging a violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.15005 and 30 C.F.R. 57.11012 and proposed penalties totaling $6,000. Respondent filed a timely answer denying any violation. After notice to the parties, the case came on for hearing before me. All issues were fully litigated. At the hearing, testimony was taken from the following individuals:

1. Robert H. Morley, Federal Mines Inspector for MSHA.

2. Ronald Barri, Federal Mine Inspector for MSHA.

3. Paul Belanger, Supervisory Mine Inspector for MSHA.

4. Richard Karlson, Mine Project Manager.


Page 3

~1726
5. Melvin J. Wattula, Health, Safety and Security Manager for Respondent.

At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, that matter was left open for post-hearing briefs. After the receipt of the transcript, but within the time allowed for filing of the briefs, the parties negotiated and reached a settlement agreement on both citations. Under the proposed settlement agreement, the parties propose to reduce the penalty for the citations from $6,000 to $3,240.

Based upon my review and evaluation of the record, including the evidence presented at the August 22, 1991 hearing, I find the settlement agreement to be reasonable and consistent with the statutory criteria in Section 110(i) of the Act. The settlement agreement is APPROVED.

ORDER

After careful consideration of all the evidence and testimony adduced in this case, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent pay to the Secretary of Labor a civil penalty of $3,240 within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision. Upon such payment this proceeding is DISMISSED.

August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace