Klamath Pacific Corporation

Plain-English summary

Klamath Pacific Corporation had agreed to settle eight citations, and the ALJ approved a lump-sum penalty of $956.80 instead of the $1,472.00 originally proposed. The company later wrote that it contested all alleged violations and asked that three citations be dropped. The Commission treated that letter as a request for relief from the final settlement decision, reopened the proceeding, vacated the ALJ's settlement order, and remanded the matter for the judge to determine whether relief was warranted. The $956.80 settlement order was therefore not left in effect.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.65(c), 2700.1(b), and 2700.7(a); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)
• Outcome: The settlement-approval order was reopened and vacated, and the proceeding was remanded for further proceedings.
• Key point: A later letter disputing the violations can support reopening a final settlement order when the record suggests the order may have been entered in error.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. KLAMATH PACIFIC
DDATE:
19920421
TTEXT:
April 21, 1992
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v. Docket No. WEST 91-515-M

KLAMATH PACIFIC CORPORATION

BEFORE: Ford, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, Holen, and Nelson, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1982)("Mine Act"). On February
21, 1992, Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin issued a
Decision Approving Settlement, pursuant to a motion to approve settlement
filed by the Secretary of Labor, with respect to eight citations issued to
Klamath Pacific Corporation ("Klamath Pacific"). The Secretary stated in the
motion, filed December 3, l99l, that Klamath Pacific agreed to the terms of
the settlement. In accordance with the motion, the judge assessed a lump sum
civil penalty of $956.80, a reduction in the penalties, $1,472.00, originally
proposed by the Secretary. On December 16, 1991, the Commission received a
letter from Klamath Pacific stating that it "contest[ed] all alleged
violations." On March 11, 1992, Klamath Pacific filed a letter with Judge
Merlin stating that three of the citations "should be dropped," because it did
not violate the regulation cited in those citations. For the reasons
discussed below, we reopen this proceeding, vacate the judge's decision
approving settlement, and remand this matter to the judge for further
proceedings.
The judge's jurisdiction in this proceeding terminated when his decision
approving settlement was issued on February 21, 1992. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.65(c).
The judge's decision became a final decision of the Commission 40 days after
issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). The Commission did not act on Klamath
Pacific's March 11, 1992, letter within the period provided in
the Mine Act for considering requests for discretionary review due to
processing error. Under these circumstances, we deem Klamath Pacific's
March 11 letter to be a request for relief from a final Commission decision.
Relief from a final judgment or order of the Commission is available to
a party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) & (6) on the basis of inadvertence,
mistake, surprise, excusable neglect, or any other reason justifying relief.

Page 2

29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply, "so far as
practicable" and "as appropriate," in the absence of applicable Commission
rules). See, e.g., Danny Johnson v. Lamar Mining Co., 10 FMSHRC 506, 508
(April 1988). Klamath Pacific's letters suggest that the decision approving
settlement may have been entered in error. Accordingly, we conclude that
this matter should be reopened and remanded in order to afford Klamath Pacific
the opportunity to present its position to the judge, who shall determine
whether final relief from the decision approving settlement is warranted.
For the foregoing reasons, we reopen this matter, vacate the judge's
order approving settlement, and remand this matter to the judge for
appropriate proceedings. Klamath Pacific is reminded to serve counsel for the
Secretary with copies of its filings in this proceeding. 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.7(a)
~537
TALLYSHEET
Klamath Pacific Corporation, Docket No. WEST 91-515-M
Commissioner Date
Reopen proceeding, vacate Decision Approving Settlement, and remand to
judge (order to that effect attached)
Other
Comments:
Please return to W. Lew